An evaluation framework for sparse 4D (3D + time) imaging reconstruction via bootstrapped cross‐validation

Four-dimensional (4D; 3D + time) microscopic imaging has emerged as a powerful technique for investigating dynamic phenomena in complex systems, enabling direct visualisation of structural evolution in space and time. However, when pushing the limits of spatiotemporal resolution, most time-resolved imaging techniques yield inherently sparse 4D datasets. While deep learning-based reconstruction methods have shown promise in reconstructing 4D from sparse spatiotemporal measurements, a practical approach for evaluating their performance in the absence of a 4D reference has, to the best of our knowledge, been lacking. Here, we present a bootstrapped cross-validation framework that estimates reconstruction performance by quantifying correlations between reconstructions generated from independently sampled subsets of the acquired data, as inspired by the 3D validation strategy in cryo-electron microscopy, where reconstructions from split datasets are compared to assess resolutions. This enables both qualitative and quantitative assessment in the absence of ground truth. We investigate two representative scenarios with sparse and ultra-sparse X-ray datasets and validate this approach using 4D-ONIX, a 4D deep-learning reconstruction method, on simulated water droplet collision experiments. The proposed approach provides a reference-free framework for performance estimation and support for better-informed experimental strategies across a wide range of ultrafast imaging applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Microscopy
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.70194
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An evaluation framework for sparse 4D (3D + time) imaging reconstruction via bootstrapped cross‐validation

Pablo Villanueva‐Perez, Yuhe Zhang, Tobias Ritschel, Zisheng Yao et al.
2 links
Journal of Microscopy
Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
article

An evaluation framework for sparse 4D (3D + time) imaging reconstruction via bootstrapped cross‐validation

Pablo Villanueva‐Perez, Yuhe Zhang, Tobias Ritschel, Zisheng Yao, Zhe Hu
article en

Abstract

Four-dimensional (4D; 3D + time) microscopic imaging has emerged as a powerful technique for investigating dynamic phenomena in complex systems, enabling direct visualisation of structural evolution in space and time. However, when pushing the limits of spatiotemporal resolution, most time-resolved imaging techniques yield inherently sparse 4D datasets. While deep learning-based reconstruction methods have shown promise in reconstructing 4D from sparse spatiotemporal measurements, a practical approach for evaluating their performance in the absence of a 4D reference has, to the best of our knowledge, been lacking. Here, we present a bootstrapped cross-validation framework that estimates reconstruction performance by quantifying correlations between reconstructions generated from independently sampled subsets of the acquired data, as inspired by the 3D validation strategy in cryo-electron microscopy, where reconstructions from split datasets are compared to assess resolutions. This enables both qualitative and quantitative assessment in the absence of ground truth. We investigate two representative scenarios with sparse and ultra-sparse X-ray datasets and validate this approach using 4D-ONIX, a 4D deep-learning reconstruction method, on simulated water droplet collision experiments. The proposed approach provides a reference-free framework for performance estimation and support for better-informed experimental strategies across a wide range of ultrafast imaging applications.

Journal of Microscopy
Lund University (SE), NanoLund (SE), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon