Burden of Intrapancreatic Fat Deposition in Type 2 Diabetes and the Role of Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence supports a role for high intrapancreatic fat deposition (IPFD) in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, the magnitude of this association and the extent to which it is influenced by body mass index (BMI), liver fat content (LFC), and age remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively evaluate IPFD measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in individuals with T2DM and to investigate study-level factors contributing to between-study variability. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for observational studies comparing MRI-measured IPFD in individuals with T2DM versus non-diabetic controls, excluding studies in which IPFD quantification was performed using AI-based models. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) were estimated using a restricted maximum likelihood approach with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Heterogeneity was explored through subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Thirty studies (n=3,980) were included. Individuals with T2DM had significantly higher IPFD than non-diabetic controls (SMD 1.13, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.51), with no significant differences when stratified by pancreatic region, MRI technique, geographic region, sample size, and risk of bias. In multivariable models, BMI remained the only consistent moderating covariate, and the excess IPFD in T2DM persisted after adjusting for BMI, LFC, and age (intercept=0.797, p=0.010, false discovery rate-adjusted p=0.018). Advanced heterogeneity exploration identified no structural outliers, and the pooled effect size remained consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: T2DM is associated with substantially higher MRI-quantified IPFD, independent of study-level differences in BMI, LFC, and age. Although causality cannot be inferred, these findings support the hypothesis that IPFD may be involved in the underlying mechanism of T2DM. They also suggest that high IPFD could represent a metabolic hallmark, with potential implications for risk stratification and therapeutic targeting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Obesity Reports
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-026-00718-3
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Burden of Intrapancreatic Fat Deposition in Type 2 Diabetes and the Role of Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Maxim S. Petrov, Hyun Hee Sul, Matheus Souza, Saeed Ahmad et al.
Current Obesity Reports
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Burden of Intrapancreatic Fat Deposition in Type 2 Diabetes and the Role of Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Maxim S. Petrov, Hyun Hee Sul, Matheus Souza, Saeed Ahmad, Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Alessandro Mantovani
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence supports a role for high intrapancreatic fat deposition (IPFD) in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, the magnitude of this association and the extent to which it is influenced by body mass index (BMI), liver fat content (LFC), and age remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively evaluate IPFD measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in individuals with T2DM and to investigate study-level factors contributing to between-study variability. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for observational studies comparing MRI-measured IPFD in individuals with T2DM versus non-diabetic controls, excluding studies in which IPFD quantification was performed using AI-based models. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) were estimated using a restricted maximum likelihood approach with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Heterogeneity was explored through subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Thirty studies (n=3,980) were included. Individuals with T2DM had significantly higher IPFD than non-diabetic controls (SMD 1.13, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.51), with no significant differences when stratified by pancreatic region, MRI technique, geographic region, sample size, and risk of bias. In multivariable models, BMI remained the only consistent moderating covariate, and the excess IPFD in T2DM persisted after adjusting for BMI, LFC, and age (intercept=0.797, p=0.010, false discovery rate-adjusted p=0.018). Advanced heterogeneity exploration identified no structural outliers, and the pooled effect size remained consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: T2DM is associated with substantially higher MRI-quantified IPFD, independent of study-level differences in BMI, LFC, and age. Although causality cannot be inferred, these findings support the hypothesis that IPFD may be involved in the underlying mechanism of T2DM. They also suggest that high IPFD could represent a metabolic hallmark, with potential implications for risk stratification and therapeutic targeting.

Current Obesity ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Verona (IT), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Texas Tech University (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of Auckland (NZ), Jersey City Medical Center (US), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria (IT), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
University of Auckland
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.