Active Cycle of Breathing Technique Versus Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Therapy Versus Exercise With Huffing During an Exacerbation of Bronchiectasis: A Randomised, Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT Background and Objective The relative effectiveness of airway clearance techniques (ACTs) during an exacerbation of bronchiectasis is unknown. This study aimed to compare the effects of three ACTs on sputum expectoration, health‐related quality‐of‐life (HRQOL), and exacerbation rates in adults hospitalised with an exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Methods A randomised controlled trial of active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT), oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) therapy and walking with huffing. Sputum wet weight was collected during ACT sessions, 1‐h post‐session and the following 23 h on day 2 and day of discharge. HRQOL was assessed using the Quality of Life‐Bronchiectasis (QoL‐B) questionnaire and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) on day 2 and day of discharge. Time to first exacerbation was explored for 6 months following discharge. Results Fifty‐five participants were recruited. ACBT was associated with smaller sputum wet weight 1‐h post session on day of discharge compared to walking with huffing (mean difference −2.58 g); no other significant differences between groups in sputum weights were observed. ACBT and walking with huffing significantly improved selected measures of HRQOL (LCQ total score and multiple QOL‐B domains) at hospital discharge while OPEP therapy produced minimal changes. ACBT (158 days, 95% CI 139–177) resulted in a longer time to first exacerbation than walking with huffing (118 days, 95% CI 83–154) and OPEP therapy (89 days, 95% CI 69–111) but this finding should be interpreted with caution due to loss to follow‐up. Conclusion Walking with huffing and ACBT gave similar improvements in sputum expectoration and HRQOL during hospitalisation in adults with an exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Trial Registration The study was registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000428864) on 16‐04‐2021

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respirology
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/resp.70265
Primary Topic
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Active Cycle of Breathing Technique Versus Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Therapy Versus Exercise With Huffing During an Exacerbation of Bronchiectasis: A Randomised, Controlled Trial

Nicole Harley, Ashleigh Canov, Wayne Hing, Rodney Pope et al.
Respirology
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
article

Active Cycle of Breathing Technique Versus Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Therapy Versus Exercise With Huffing During an Exacerbation of Bronchiectasis: A Randomised, Controlled Trial

Nicole Harley, Ashleigh Canov, Wayne Hing, Rodney Pope, A L Lee, Jennifer Phillips
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Objective The relative effectiveness of airway clearance techniques (ACTs) during an exacerbation of bronchiectasis is unknown. This study aimed to compare the effects of three ACTs on sputum expectoration, health‐related quality‐of‐life (HRQOL), and exacerbation rates in adults hospitalised with an exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Methods A randomised controlled trial of active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT), oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) therapy and walking with huffing. Sputum wet weight was collected during ACT sessions, 1‐h post‐session and the following 23 h on day 2 and day of discharge. HRQOL was assessed using the Quality of Life‐Bronchiectasis (QoL‐B) questionnaire and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) on day 2 and day of discharge. Time to first exacerbation was explored for 6 months following discharge. Results Fifty‐five participants were recruited. ACBT was associated with smaller sputum wet weight 1‐h post session on day of discharge compared to walking with huffing (mean difference −2.58 g); no other significant differences between groups in sputum weights were observed. ACBT and walking with huffing significantly improved selected measures of HRQOL (LCQ total score and multiple QOL‐B domains) at hospital discharge while OPEP therapy produced minimal changes. ACBT (158 days, 95% CI 139–177) resulted in a longer time to first exacerbation than walking with huffing (118 days, 95% CI 83–154) and OPEP therapy (89 days, 95% CI 69–111) but this finding should be interpreted with caution due to loss to follow‐up. Conclusion Walking with huffing and ACBT gave similar improvements in sputum expectoration and HRQOL during hospitalisation in adults with an exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Trial Registration The study was registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000428864) on 16‐04‐2021

Respirology
Bond University (AU), Queensland Health (AU), Charles Sturt University (AU), Wesley Hospital (AU), Institute for Breathing and Sleep (AU), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.