Validation of the third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire for Portugal

The prevalence and impact of exposure to psychosocial risk factors seems to be increasing in labour contexts in general. The assessment and measurement of psychosocial work factors is essential for the improvement of healthy workplaces and should be incorporated into health and safety management programmes. The assessment of psychosocial factors requires the selection of appropriate instruments that respond to the multidimensionality of that construct. The COPSOQ III covers a multitude of theoretical approaches and provides comprehensive information on psychosocial working conditions that may help to deduce actions for their improvement. The use of COPSOQ III in national context needs prior validation studies. In this regard, the paper aims to assess the psychometric properties of the middle version of COPSOQ III as to provide evidence on the validity of this instrument to be used for the Portuguese working population. The validation process comprised a national sample of 7,506 participants that included different occupational sectors based on a cross-sectional study. Construct validity was assessed through Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the internal consistency of the scales was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. The results revealed a satisfactory reliability and ability of the Portuguese middle version of COPSOQ III (COPSOQ III-PT) to discriminate the psychosocial dimensions. The distribution of the scores of the study sample by each scale and by sex enables a better interpretation of the results based on reference values.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006036
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire for Portugal

Pedro Bem‐Haja, Rui Azevedo, Anabela Pereira, Joaquim S. Pinto et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Validation of the third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire for Portugal

Pedro Bem‐Haja, Rui Azevedo, Anabela Pereira, Joaquim S. Pinto, Samuel Antunes, Isabel Silva, Iara Teixeira, Paula Vagos, Carlos Vinícius Andrade da Silva, Cláudia Fernandes, Elisabeth Brito, Teresa P. Cotrim, Isabel Souto
article en

Abstract

The prevalence and impact of exposure to psychosocial risk factors seems to be increasing in labour contexts in general. The assessment and measurement of psychosocial work factors is essential for the improvement of healthy workplaces and should be incorporated into health and safety management programmes. The assessment of psychosocial factors requires the selection of appropriate instruments that respond to the multidimensionality of that construct. The COPSOQ III covers a multitude of theoretical approaches and provides comprehensive information on psychosocial working conditions that may help to deduce actions for their improvement. The use of COPSOQ III in national context needs prior validation studies. In this regard, the paper aims to assess the psychometric properties of the middle version of COPSOQ III as to provide evidence on the validity of this instrument to be used for the Portuguese working population. The validation process comprised a national sample of 7,506 participants that included different occupational sectors based on a cross-sectional study. Construct validity was assessed through Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the internal consistency of the scales was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. The results revealed a satisfactory reliability and ability of the Portuguese middle version of COPSOQ III (COPSOQ III-PT) to discriminate the psychosocial dimensions. The distribution of the scores of the study sample by each scale and by sex enables a better interpretation of the results based on reference values.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(5)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.