Linear vs Logarithmic Scaling for Ordering of Electrotactile Cues

Electrotactile feedback is versatile and research is mounting on how to practically use the modality. Most work investigating distinguishable parameter levels of electrotactile cues used linearly scaled levels, yet sensing often follows a logarithmic scale. In our work we directly compared linear and logarithmic scaling for electrotactile cues in an ordering task. Our results found that while correct ordering was slightly better with logarithmic scaling, this was not statistically significant. These results contribute to the discussion around how to best choose values for electrotactile cue presentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20286029
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linear vs Logarithmic Scaling for Ordering of Electrotactile Cues

Patrizia Di Campli San Vito
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

Linear vs Logarithmic Scaling for Ordering of Electrotactile Cues

Patrizia Di Campli San Vito
article en

Abstract

Electrotactile feedback is versatile and research is mounting on how to practically use the modality. Most work investigating distinguishable parameter levels of electrotactile cues used linearly scaled levels, yet sensing often follows a logarithmic scale. In our work we directly compared linear and logarithmic scaling for electrotactile cues in an ordering task. Our results found that while correct ordering was slightly better with logarithmic scaling, this was not statistically significant. These results contribute to the discussion around how to best choose values for electrotactile cue presentation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.