Comparing DNA metabarcoding with light microscopy to identify eukaryotic phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak

Abstract Marine phytoplankton monitoring has long relied on microscopy, but DNA metabarcoding has recently emerged as a complementary approach. This study assessed the applicability of DNA metabarcoding of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene in marine monitoring and compared its results with conventional microscopy. We analyzed data from 232 surface water samples from 17 monitoring stations in the Baltic Sea, Kattegat, and Skagerrak. Metabarcoding detected more orders, genera, and species than microscopy, with a 43% overlap in the most common genera identified by both methods. Despite attempts to normalize sequence reads to spike-in DNA or DNA concentrations, the correlations between abundances derived from the two methods were weak, though varied considerably between taxonomic groups and geographical areas. Correlations were consistently stronger when using carbon and biovolume concentrations than cell abundances. Our results highlight the potential of metabarcoding to expand biodiversity assessments and advance our understanding of microbial biodiversity in marine ecosystems. As a complement to microscopy, it can enhance existing monitoring efforts. Future improvements in reference database completeness, adoption of long-read sequencing technologies, and better characterization of gene copy number variability per cell are needed to further extend the applicability of metabarcoding for quantitative analyses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48838-z
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing DNA metabarcoding with light microscopy to identify eukaryotic phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak

Krzysztof T Jurdzinski, Anders F. Andersson, Jenny Lycken, Anders Torstensson et al.
Scientific Reports
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Comparing DNA metabarcoding with light microscopy to identify eukaryotic phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak

Krzysztof T Jurdzinski, Anders F. Andersson, Jenny Lycken, Anders Torstensson, Sonia Brugel, Mikael Hedblom, Bengt Karlson, Agneta Andersson, Meike A. C. Latz, Markus Lindh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Marine phytoplankton monitoring has long relied on microscopy, but DNA metabarcoding has recently emerged as a complementary approach. This study assessed the applicability of DNA metabarcoding of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene in marine monitoring and compared its results with conventional microscopy. We analyzed data from 232 surface water samples from 17 monitoring stations in the Baltic Sea, Kattegat, and Skagerrak. Metabarcoding detected more orders, genera, and species than microscopy, with a 43% overlap in the most common genera identified by both methods. Despite attempts to normalize sequence reads to spike-in DNA or DNA concentrations, the correlations between abundances derived from the two methods were weak, though varied considerably between taxonomic groups and geographical areas. Correlations were consistently stronger when using carbon and biovolume concentrations than cell abundances. Our results highlight the potential of metabarcoding to expand biodiversity assessments and advance our understanding of microbial biodiversity in marine ecosystems. As a complement to microscopy, it can enhance existing monitoring efforts. Future improvements in reference database completeness, adoption of long-read sequencing technologies, and better characterization of gene copy number variability per cell are needed to further extend the applicability of metabarcoding for quantitative analyses.

Scientific Reports
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.