Field evaluation in the Eastern United States of a biological control Blossom Protect for fire blight suppression efficacy, potential to cause fruit russeting, and compatibility with fungicides

Fire blight is a destructive disease of apple and pear, and its severity is intensified under humid conditions. Biological controls are important components of the integrated management of plant diseases; however, field trials in the eastern United States have shown that currently available bacteria- and bacteriophage-based biocontrols lack the consistency and efficacy needed to meet industry standards under humid conditions. Blossom Protect is a yeast-based biocontrol agent developed for fire blight and post-harvest diseases of apple. Although Blossom Protect has shown effectiveness in the Pacific Northwest under the arid conditions, its efficacy has not yet been tested at a large scale in the eastern U.S. In this study, we conducted a multi-location, multi-season field evaluation of Blossom Protect to determine its effectiveness in suppressing fire blight. Blossom Protect consistently suppressed blossom blight incidence, with an average disease suppression determined at 63.9%, which exceeded that of oxytetracycline (57.1%) but remained lower than that of streptomycin (79.3%). The disease-suppression efficacy of Blossom Protect was further enhanced by the use of a contact sterilant, Oxidate, in an integrated management program. Blossom Protect increased fruit russeting; however, russeting was limited to 6-10% of the fruit surface on average and did not increase the proportion of out-of-grade fruit. We also assessed compatibility with fungicides commonly applied during bloom, and found Blossom Protect to be incompatible with conventional multi-site and quinone outside inhibitor (FRAC M and FRAC11) fungicides, as well as OMRI-listed contact sterilants and sulfur-based materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Disease
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-02-26-0264-re
Primary Topic
Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field evaluation in the Eastern United States of a biological control Blossom Protect for fire blight suppression efficacy, potential to cause fruit russeting, and compatibility with fungicides

Sara M. Villani, George W. Sundin, Kerik Cox, Srđan G. Aćimović et al.
Plant Disease
Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
article

Field evaluation in the Eastern United States of a biological control Blossom Protect for fire blight suppression efficacy, potential to cause fruit russeting, and compatibility with fungicides

Sara M. Villani, George W. Sundin, Kerik Cox, Srđan G. Aćimović, Jewell Jung, Kari Peter, Quan Zeng
article en

Abstract

Fire blight is a destructive disease of apple and pear, and its severity is intensified under humid conditions. Biological controls are important components of the integrated management of plant diseases; however, field trials in the eastern United States have shown that currently available bacteria- and bacteriophage-based biocontrols lack the consistency and efficacy needed to meet industry standards under humid conditions. Blossom Protect is a yeast-based biocontrol agent developed for fire blight and post-harvest diseases of apple. Although Blossom Protect has shown effectiveness in the Pacific Northwest under the arid conditions, its efficacy has not yet been tested at a large scale in the eastern U.S. In this study, we conducted a multi-location, multi-season field evaluation of Blossom Protect to determine its effectiveness in suppressing fire blight. Blossom Protect consistently suppressed blossom blight incidence, with an average disease suppression determined at 63.9%, which exceeded that of oxytetracycline (57.1%) but remained lower than that of streptomycin (79.3%). The disease-suppression efficacy of Blossom Protect was further enhanced by the use of a contact sterilant, Oxidate, in an integrated management program. Blossom Protect increased fruit russeting; however, russeting was limited to 6-10% of the fruit surface on average and did not increase the proportion of out-of-grade fruit. We also assessed compatibility with fungicides commonly applied during bloom, and found Blossom Protect to be incompatible with conventional multi-site and quinone outside inhibitor (FRAC M and FRAC11) fungicides, as well as OMRI-listed contact sterilants and sulfur-based materials.

Plant Disease
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Connecticut (US), Cornell University (US), Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station (US), Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory (US), Virginia Tech (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.