Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Compared with Sham Operation (SIFSO Trial)

Minimally invasive fusion of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) as a treatment for SIJ pain remains controversial. The SIFSO trial was a double-blinded, sham-controlled randomized trial with a primary end point of 6 months. Sixty-three patients were randomized to undergo either minimally invasive SIJ fusion or sham surgery. At the 6-month primary end point, a mean reduction of 2.6 points on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was demonstrated in the surgical group, compared with a reduction of 1.7 points in the sham group (group difference: −1.0 point [95% confidence interval (CI), −2.2 to 0.3; p = 0.13]). Patients in the sham group were allowed to cross over to surgery after unblinding at 6 months. The current report describes the 2-year outcomes of all patients, including those who underwent SIJ fusion as part of the initial surgical group, those who crossed over to fusion after sham surgery, and those who remained in the sham group. After unblinding at 6 months, 26 of the 31 patients in the sham group crossed over to fusion. All 63 patients completed the 2-year follow-up. The mean age at baseline was 45 years (range, 26 to 63 years), and 59 of the 63 patients were female. Compared with baseline, the reduction in the NRS score at 2 years was 3.1 (95% CI, 2.0 to 4.1) in the initial fusion group (n = 32), 1.6 (95% CI, −1.8 to 5.0) in the sham group that did not cross over (n = 5), and 3.5 (95% CI, 2.5 to 4.5) in the crossover group (n = 26). In conclusion, surgically treated patients experienced significant pain reduction and improved physical function at the 2-year follow-up, compared with baseline, and the results of SIJ fusion were sustained from 6 months to 2 years. Due to crossover and unblinding, it was not possible to determine the actual effect of minimally invasive SIJ fusion compared with sham surgery at 2 years. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.25.00918
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Compared with Sham Operation (SIFSO Trial)

Thomas Kibsgård, Elias Diarbakerli, Paul Gerdhem, Engelke Marie Randers
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Compared with Sham Operation (SIFSO Trial)

Thomas Kibsgård, Elias Diarbakerli, Paul Gerdhem, Engelke Marie Randers
article en

Abstract

Minimally invasive fusion of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) as a treatment for SIJ pain remains controversial. The SIFSO trial was a double-blinded, sham-controlled randomized trial with a primary end point of 6 months. Sixty-three patients were randomized to undergo either minimally invasive SIJ fusion or sham surgery. At the 6-month primary end point, a mean reduction of 2.6 points on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was demonstrated in the surgical group, compared with a reduction of 1.7 points in the sham group (group difference: −1.0 point [95% confidence interval (CI), −2.2 to 0.3; p = 0.13]). Patients in the sham group were allowed to cross over to surgery after unblinding at 6 months. The current report describes the 2-year outcomes of all patients, including those who underwent SIJ fusion as part of the initial surgical group, those who crossed over to fusion after sham surgery, and those who remained in the sham group. After unblinding at 6 months, 26 of the 31 patients in the sham group crossed over to fusion. All 63 patients completed the 2-year follow-up. The mean age at baseline was 45 years (range, 26 to 63 years), and 59 of the 63 patients were female. Compared with baseline, the reduction in the NRS score at 2 years was 3.1 (95% CI, 2.0 to 4.1) in the initial fusion group (n = 32), 1.6 (95% CI, −1.8 to 5.0) in the sham group that did not cross over (n = 5), and 3.5 (95% CI, 2.5 to 4.5) in the crossover group (n = 26). In conclusion, surgically treated patients experienced significant pain reduction and improved physical function at the 2-year follow-up, compared with baseline, and the results of SIJ fusion were sustained from 6 months to 2 years. Due to crossover and unblinding, it was not possible to determine the actual effect of minimally invasive SIJ fusion compared with sham surgery at 2 years. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Uppsala University (SE), Oslo University Hospital (NO), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), University of Oslo (NO), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.