AI Regulation in U.S. States: Lessons Learned and Key Takeaways

U.S. states have rapidly attempted to fill the regulatory void created by the lack of comprehensive federal legislation, leading to a dramatic surge in state-level artificial intelligence (AI)-related bills. Between 2019 and 2024, lawmakers introduced nearly 803 AI bills; yet only 127 have been enacted, and 17 have been adopted as resolutions. However, this state-driven legislative activity has resulted in an unprecedented and fragmented regulatory landscape. Our analysis of all AI-focused bills across U.S. states identifies the prominent legislative themes, including government use of AI, regulation of AI in the private sector, responsible AI practices, bias mitigation, workforce development, child protection, consumer protection, and the creation of advisory bodies or studies, highlighting widespread concerns about transparency, accountability, and societal risks. Additionally, we observe striking variation across states and political alignments. A handful of states, notably New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and Massachusetts, account for a disproportionately large share of pending bills, while pioneering states such as Colorado, Utah, and California have enacted substantive laws addressing distinct facets of AI governance. This decentralized approach validates the notion of states as “laboratories” of regulation, but also underscores the risks associated with fragmented rules. Lastly, we compare these diverse state-level initiatives with the European Union’s uniform AI Act and discuss their implications for shaping future federal AI policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications of the ACM
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3778178
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Regulation in U.S. States: Lessons Learned and Key Takeaways

Pavankumar Mulgund, Lavlin Agrawal, Richelle Oakley DaSouza, Raghvendra Singh et al.
Communications of the ACM
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI Regulation in U.S. States: Lessons Learned and Key Takeaways

Pavankumar Mulgund, Lavlin Agrawal, Richelle Oakley DaSouza, Raghvendra Singh, Kavita Bhaya
article en

Abstract

U.S. states have rapidly attempted to fill the regulatory void created by the lack of comprehensive federal legislation, leading to a dramatic surge in state-level artificial intelligence (AI)-related bills. Between 2019 and 2024, lawmakers introduced nearly 803 AI bills; yet only 127 have been enacted, and 17 have been adopted as resolutions. However, this state-driven legislative activity has resulted in an unprecedented and fragmented regulatory landscape. Our analysis of all AI-focused bills across U.S. states identifies the prominent legislative themes, including government use of AI, regulation of AI in the private sector, responsible AI practices, bias mitigation, workforce development, child protection, consumer protection, and the creation of advisory bodies or studies, highlighting widespread concerns about transparency, accountability, and societal risks. Additionally, we observe striking variation across states and political alignments. A handful of states, notably New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and Massachusetts, account for a disproportionately large share of pending bills, while pioneering states such as Colorado, Utah, and California have enacted substantive laws addressing distinct facets of AI governance. This decentralized approach validates the notion of states as “laboratories” of regulation, but also underscores the risks associated with fragmented rules. Lastly, we compare these diverse state-level initiatives with the European Union’s uniform AI Act and discuss their implications for shaping future federal AI policies.

Communications of the ACM
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US), University of Memphis (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.