Bowel cancer care in individuals with an intellectual disability: a population-based cohort study of symptoms, diagnostic pathways, treatment and survival

Abstract Background People with an intellectual disability (ID) are at increased risk of bowel cancer. However, evidence on their presenting symptoms, diagnostic pathways, treatments and survival remains limited. Methods A matched cohort study was conducted using linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink), hospital, cancer, and mortality records. Outcomes included symptoms associated with bowel cancer, faecal immunochemical or faecal occult blood (FIT/FOB) testing, urgent suspected cancer (USC) referral, endoscopy, surgery, systemic anticancer therapy (SACT), and bowel cancer-specific mortality. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs), risk ratios (aRRs), and hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using Poisson, modified Poisson and Cox regression. Results A total of 111,034 individuals with an ID were matched to 1,964,420 comparators. ID was associated with increased risk of bowel cancer (aHR 1.30, 1.18–1.44), particularly before age 50 years (aRR 2.19, 1.68–2.85). People with an ID presented more frequently with symptoms associated with bowel cancer (aIRR 2.59, 2.53–2.65) but, following such symptoms, were less likely to undergo FIT/FOB testing (aRR 0.74, 0.67–0.83), USC referral (aRR 0.57, 0.52–0.62), endoscopy (aRR 0.45, 0.42–0.49), or receive a diagnosis within 56 days (aRR 0.52, 0.41–0.67). They were also less likely to be diagnosed via screening (aRR 0.27, 0.14–0.50) or USC referral (aRR 0.62, 0.50–0.76), and more likely to be diagnosed via emergency presentation (aRR 1.76, 1.52–2.02), on the date of death (aRR 5.08, 2.92–8.84), or with stage IV disease (aRR 1.25, 1.01–1.56). ID was associated with similar proportions receiving curative surgery for stage I–III disease (aRR 0.98, 0.79–1.19), but markedly lower proportions receiving SACT for stage IV (aRR 0.15, 0.05–0.46), and higher bowel cancer-specific mortality across all stages (aHR 2.00, 1.71–2.33). Conclusions People with an ID experience worse outcomes across nearly all stages of the bowel cancer care pathway, including referral, investigation, treatment and survival. Earlier screening may be justified given the elevated risk in those under age 50 years.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-04906-9
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bowel cancer care in individuals with an intellectual disability: a population-based cohort study of symptoms, diagnostic pathways, treatment and survival

Umesh Chauhan, Oliver John Kennedy, Paul C. Lorigan, Darren Mark Ashcroft et al.
BMC Medicine
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Bowel cancer care in individuals with an intellectual disability: a population-based cohort study of symptoms, diagnostic pathways, treatment and survival

Umesh Chauhan, Oliver John Kennedy, Paul C. Lorigan, Darren Mark Ashcroft, Samuel W.D. Merriel, Louise Gorman, Antonia Perumal, Tjeerd Van Staa, Alison Wright
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background People with an intellectual disability (ID) are at increased risk of bowel cancer. However, evidence on their presenting symptoms, diagnostic pathways, treatments and survival remains limited. Methods A matched cohort study was conducted using linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink), hospital, cancer, and mortality records. Outcomes included symptoms associated with bowel cancer, faecal immunochemical or faecal occult blood (FIT/FOB) testing, urgent suspected cancer (USC) referral, endoscopy, surgery, systemic anticancer therapy (SACT), and bowel cancer-specific mortality. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs), risk ratios (aRRs), and hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using Poisson, modified Poisson and Cox regression. Results A total of 111,034 individuals with an ID were matched to 1,964,420 comparators. ID was associated with increased risk of bowel cancer (aHR 1.30, 1.18–1.44), particularly before age 50 years (aRR 2.19, 1.68–2.85). People with an ID presented more frequently with symptoms associated with bowel cancer (aIRR 2.59, 2.53–2.65) but, following such symptoms, were less likely to undergo FIT/FOB testing (aRR 0.74, 0.67–0.83), USC referral (aRR 0.57, 0.52–0.62), endoscopy (aRR 0.45, 0.42–0.49), or receive a diagnosis within 56 days (aRR 0.52, 0.41–0.67). They were also less likely to be diagnosed via screening (aRR 0.27, 0.14–0.50) or USC referral (aRR 0.62, 0.50–0.76), and more likely to be diagnosed via emergency presentation (aRR 1.76, 1.52–2.02), on the date of death (aRR 5.08, 2.92–8.84), or with stage IV disease (aRR 1.25, 1.01–1.56). ID was associated with similar proportions receiving curative surgery for stage I–III disease (aRR 0.98, 0.79–1.19), but markedly lower proportions receiving SACT for stage IV (aRR 0.15, 0.05–0.46), and higher bowel cancer-specific mortality across all stages (aHR 2.00, 1.71–2.33). Conclusions People with an ID experience worse outcomes across nearly all stages of the bowel cancer care pathway, including referral, investigation, treatment and survival. Earlier screening may be justified given the elevated risk in those under age 50 years.

BMC MedicineVol. 24(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.