Profilometric Quantification of Wear-Track Degradation in FFF Kevlar-Reinforced ASA Composites

Fused filament fabrication (FFF) produces components with characteristic topographical features that influence their tribological behavior. Because conventional roughness parameters may not fully describe the localized surface degradation of reinforced FFF polymers, this study evaluates the wear-track evolution of FFF aramid fiber-reinforced Acrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate (ASA) composites using a comparative profilometric framework based on pre-wear and post-wear measurements. Specimens with different infill configurations underwent dry sliding Ball-on-Disc tribological testing, followed by profilometric wear-track analysis and optical microscopy inspection. The macroscopic wear response exhibited a non-monotonic dependence on infill configuration. Under the present experimental conditions, the 30% infill configuration showed the most favorable average wear response, with the lowest wear volume and specific wear rate, whereas the 90% infill configuration showed the highest material loss. To compare the surface modifications induced by sliding, three derived relative profilometric descriptors were evaluated: Surface Texture Alteration Index (STAI), Peak Deformation Index (PDI) and Material Ratio Preservation Index (MRPI). These descriptors were used as complementary comparative parameters rather than replacements for standardized roughness or Abbott–Firestone-based measurements. Statistical analysis showed a very strong association between maximum wear-track depth and calculated volumetric material loss, indicating that deeper wear-track profiles were consistently associated with higher material removal within the investigated dataset. Furthermore, correlation analysis suggested that the initial material ratio may be more closely associated with the subsequent wear response than the initial arithmetic mean roughness. This study indicates that combining wear volume, wear-track geometry, optical microscopy and relative profilometric descriptors provides a useful comparative approach for evaluating degradation in FFF Kevlar-reinforced ASA components under sliding conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19102135
Primary Topic
Tribology and Wear Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Profilometric Quantification of Wear-Track Degradation in FFF Kevlar-Reinforced ASA Composites

Patricia Isabela Brăileanu, Nicoleta Elisabeta Pascu, Mihai Mocanu
Materials
Tribology and Wear Analysis
article

Profilometric Quantification of Wear-Track Degradation in FFF Kevlar-Reinforced ASA Composites

Patricia Isabela Brăileanu, Nicoleta Elisabeta Pascu, Mihai Mocanu
article en

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication (FFF) produces components with characteristic topographical features that influence their tribological behavior. Because conventional roughness parameters may not fully describe the localized surface degradation of reinforced FFF polymers, this study evaluates the wear-track evolution of FFF aramid fiber-reinforced Acrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate (ASA) composites using a comparative profilometric framework based on pre-wear and post-wear measurements. Specimens with different infill configurations underwent dry sliding Ball-on-Disc tribological testing, followed by profilometric wear-track analysis and optical microscopy inspection. The macroscopic wear response exhibited a non-monotonic dependence on infill configuration. Under the present experimental conditions, the 30% infill configuration showed the most favorable average wear response, with the lowest wear volume and specific wear rate, whereas the 90% infill configuration showed the highest material loss. To compare the surface modifications induced by sliding, three derived relative profilometric descriptors were evaluated: Surface Texture Alteration Index (STAI), Peak Deformation Index (PDI) and Material Ratio Preservation Index (MRPI). These descriptors were used as complementary comparative parameters rather than replacements for standardized roughness or Abbott–Firestone-based measurements. Statistical analysis showed a very strong association between maximum wear-track depth and calculated volumetric material loss, indicating that deeper wear-track profiles were consistently associated with higher material removal within the investigated dataset. Furthermore, correlation analysis suggested that the initial material ratio may be more closely associated with the subsequent wear response than the initial arithmetic mean roughness. This study indicates that combining wear volume, wear-track geometry, optical microscopy and relative profilometric descriptors provides a useful comparative approach for evaluating degradation in FFF Kevlar-reinforced ASA components under sliding conditions.

MaterialsVol. 19(10)
National Institute for Laser Plasma and Radiation Physics (RO), Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Tribology and Wear Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.