The Chornobyl Exclusion Zone as a wildlife refuge: restricted human access shaped mammal recolonization

Abstract Land-use changes and habitat degradation threaten biodiversity and ecosystem functions globally. Large terrestrial mammals are particularly vulnerable due to low reproductive rates, large spatial requirements and sensitivity to human disturbances. Increasing coverage and effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) is vital to conserve mammal species and their habitats. We used camera trapping to assess the impact of human activities and landscape characteristics on diversity, occupancy and detection probabilities of 11 terrestrial mammals in northern Ukraine in 2020–2021. We evaluated the impact of human stressors and landscape modifications on species diversity, occupancy and detection probabilities across the Ukrainian Chornobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ), regional PAs and non-PAs. We implemented hierarchical Bayesian single-species single-season occupancy models to identify the covariates that described the occupancy (Ψ) and detection (p) probabilities for each species. Species diversity, occupancy and detection probabilities were significantly higher in the Ukrainian CEZ and neighbouring Drevlianskyi Nature Reserve (highest occupancy probabilities of Przewalski’s horse, Eurasian lynx, moose and red deer) than in all other areas. PA coverage positively influenced red deer, red fox and raccoon dog occupancies, while PA protection status showed mixed effects across species. Our results demonstrate that PAs are most effective when they are large, contiguous and human access restrictions are actively enforced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.3151
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Chornobyl Exclusion Zone as a wildlife refuge: restricted human access shaped mammal recolonization

Alona Varukha, Richard Bischof, О.А. Борсук, Nataliia Brusentsova et al.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

The Chornobyl Exclusion Zone as a wildlife refuge: restricted human access shaped mammal recolonization

Alona Varukha, Richard Bischof, О.А. Борсук, Nataliia Brusentsova, Christian Fiderer, Svitlana Kudrenko, Adam F. Smith, Ivan Zubkovych, Volodymyr Dykovytskyi, Serhii Domashevkyi, Marco Heurich, Nuria Selva, Andreas Zedrosser
article en

Abstract

Abstract Land-use changes and habitat degradation threaten biodiversity and ecosystem functions globally. Large terrestrial mammals are particularly vulnerable due to low reproductive rates, large spatial requirements and sensitivity to human disturbances. Increasing coverage and effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) is vital to conserve mammal species and their habitats. We used camera trapping to assess the impact of human activities and landscape characteristics on diversity, occupancy and detection probabilities of 11 terrestrial mammals in northern Ukraine in 2020–2021. We evaluated the impact of human stressors and landscape modifications on species diversity, occupancy and detection probabilities across the Ukrainian Chornobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ), regional PAs and non-PAs. We implemented hierarchical Bayesian single-species single-season occupancy models to identify the covariates that described the occupancy (Ψ) and detection (p) probabilities for each species. Species diversity, occupancy and detection probabilities were significantly higher in the Ukrainian CEZ and neighbouring Drevlianskyi Nature Reserve (highest occupancy probabilities of Przewalski’s horse, Eurasian lynx, moose and red deer) than in all other areas. PA coverage positively influenced red deer, red fox and raccoon dog occupancies, while PA protection status showed mixed effects across species. Our results demonstrate that PAs are most effective when they are large, contiguous and human access restrictions are actively enforced.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 293(2071)
The Nature Conservancy (US), National Academy of Sciences (US), University of Freiburg (DE), Khmelnytskyi National University (UA), Danish Nature Agency (DK), Bavarian Forest National Park (DE), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO), Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve (CN), Altaiskiy State Nature Biosphere Reserve (RU), Landwirtschaftlichen Zentrums Baden-Württemberg​ (DE), University of Inland Norway (NO), Unidades Centrales Científico-Técnicas (ES), Institute of Nature Conservation (PL), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO), Universidad de Huelva (ES), Frankfurt Zoological Society (DE), BOKU University (AT)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.