Evolving Treatment Paradigms in Hormone Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)–negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) represents the most common subtype of MBC and has undergone substantial therapeutic evolution. Treatment has shifted from sequential endocrine therapy (ET) and chemotherapy toward personalized strategies incorporating molecularly targeted agents and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), with increasing emphasis on quality of life and shared decision making. CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET remain a first-line standard of care in high-resource settings, demonstrating consistently improved progression-free survival (PFS) and, for select agents, overall survival (OS). Management in special populations requires additional consideration of trial and real-world data, toxicity profiles, and patient preferences. Beyond ET, ADCs are reshaping the landscape. Trastuzumab deruxtecan expanded therapeutic utility across HER2-low and HER2-ultralow disease, whereas sacituzumab govitecan and datopotamab deruxtecan provide later-line options. As ADCs emerge as earlier therapies, questions regarding sequencing, cross-resistance, and toxicity remain central to clinical decision making. Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive breast cancer also requires nuanced decision making. Despite high local control rates with stereotactic body radiotherapy, randomized trials have not demonstrated consistent improvements in PFS or OS in unselected populations. Current evidence supports systemic therapy as the foundation of management, with MDT selectively considered for oligoprogression, symptom prevention, or within clinical trials. Ultimately, management of hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative MBC requires dynamic integration of tumor biology, systemic therapy advances, and patient-defined goals of care. As therapeutic complexity increases, shared decision making and equitable access to evidence-based and supportive care services remain essential for delivering high-quality, individualized oncology care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/edbk-26-520518
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolving Treatment Paradigms in Hormone Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Stephanie L. Graff, SJ Chmura, Stephanie Walker, Sara Soliman et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Evolving Treatment Paradigms in Hormone Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Stephanie L. Graff, SJ Chmura, Stephanie Walker, Sara Soliman, Alexandru Eniu, Ryan Zitter
article en

Abstract

Hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)–negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) represents the most common subtype of MBC and has undergone substantial therapeutic evolution. Treatment has shifted from sequential endocrine therapy (ET) and chemotherapy toward personalized strategies incorporating molecularly targeted agents and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), with increasing emphasis on quality of life and shared decision making. CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET remain a first-line standard of care in high-resource settings, demonstrating consistently improved progression-free survival (PFS) and, for select agents, overall survival (OS). Management in special populations requires additional consideration of trial and real-world data, toxicity profiles, and patient preferences. Beyond ET, ADCs are reshaping the landscape. Trastuzumab deruxtecan expanded therapeutic utility across HER2-low and HER2-ultralow disease, whereas sacituzumab govitecan and datopotamab deruxtecan provide later-line options. As ADCs emerge as earlier therapies, questions regarding sequencing, cross-resistance, and toxicity remain central to clinical decision making. Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive breast cancer also requires nuanced decision making. Despite high local control rates with stereotactic body radiotherapy, randomized trials have not demonstrated consistent improvements in PFS or OS in unselected populations. Current evidence supports systemic therapy as the foundation of management, with MDT selectively considered for oligoprogression, symptom prevention, or within clinical trials. Ultimately, management of hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative MBC requires dynamic integration of tumor biology, systemic therapy advances, and patient-defined goals of care. As therapeutic complexity increases, shared decision making and equitable access to evidence-based and supportive care services remain essential for delivering high-quality, individualized oncology care.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational BookVol. 46(3)
Brown University (US), Breast Cancer Alliance (US), University of Chicago (US), Institute of Oncology Research (CH), Clinique de Genolier (CH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.