Batch-dependent safety signal: Nationwide analysis of suspected adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination in Germany

Background Preliminary reports have suggested a batch-dependent safety signal for COVID-19 vaccines. It is important to establish if these findings can be replicated. Methods We used publicly available nationwide data from Germany spanning the first 3.5 years of the vaccination campaign to calculate weekly rates of spontaneously reported suspected adverse events (SAEs) per 1000 administered vaccine doses. Results SAE rates ranged between 2.2 and 22.8 per 1000 doses and women accounted for 72% of all SAEs. Crucially, SAE rates for Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), Spikevax (Moderna), and Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) were very high in the initial phase of vaccination rollout and hereafter declined precipitously. For example, SAE rates in weeks 1–4 of 2021 were 8.2, 50.8, and 620.9 per 1000 doses of Comirnaty, Spikevax, and Vaxzevria, respectively, but fell to 4.4, 11.6, and 7.4 per 1000 doses in weeks 12–16 of 2021. Conclusions SAE rates in Germany were highly elevated in the initial phase of COVID-19 vaccination rollout and then fell precipitously, a pattern compatible with a batch-dependent safety signal. Furthermore, there was a considerable overrepresentation of women with SAEs. These preliminary results call for more definitive studies of batch-dependent COVID-19 vaccine safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479261453789
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Batch-dependent safety signal: Nationwide analysis of suspected adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination in Germany

Jonathan D. Gilthorpe, Vibeke Manniche, Max Schmeling, Peter Riis Hansen et al.
International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

Batch-dependent safety signal: Nationwide analysis of suspected adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination in Germany

Jonathan D. Gilthorpe, Vibeke Manniche, Max Schmeling, Peter Riis Hansen, Vit Karásek, Tomáš Fürst
article en

Abstract

Background Preliminary reports have suggested a batch-dependent safety signal for COVID-19 vaccines. It is important to establish if these findings can be replicated. Methods We used publicly available nationwide data from Germany spanning the first 3.5 years of the vaccination campaign to calculate weekly rates of spontaneously reported suspected adverse events (SAEs) per 1000 administered vaccine doses. Results SAE rates ranged between 2.2 and 22.8 per 1000 doses and women accounted for 72% of all SAEs. Crucially, SAE rates for Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), Spikevax (Moderna), and Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) were very high in the initial phase of vaccination rollout and hereafter declined precipitously. For example, SAE rates in weeks 1–4 of 2021 were 8.2, 50.8, and 620.9 per 1000 doses of Comirnaty, Spikevax, and Vaxzevria, respectively, but fell to 4.4, 11.6, and 7.4 per 1000 doses in weeks 12–16 of 2021. Conclusions SAE rates in Germany were highly elevated in the initial phase of COVID-19 vaccination rollout and then fell precipitously, a pattern compatible with a batch-dependent safety signal. Furthermore, there was a considerable overrepresentation of women with SAEs. These preliminary results call for more definitive studies of batch-dependent COVID-19 vaccine safety.

International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Pardubice (CZ), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Innomedis (Germany) (DE), Liv Hospital (TR), Palacký University Olomouc (CZ), Umeå University (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.