Introduction of artificial plants has no detrimental or beneficial effects on laboratory zebrafish husbandry but limits available swimming space

There is a broad consensus that husbandry conditions of laboratory animals need constant improvement to guarantee optimal animal welfare and research data quality. Zebrafish ( Danio rerio ) as one of the main animal models in biomedicine and toxicology are currently kept in barren tanks in most experimental setups, as well as in animal husbandry. Structural enrichment with artificial plants is discussed at the moment as a potential refinement measure to provide a more diverse environment. Other reports have shown that this can reduce stress or anxiety and improve cognitive abilities, survival rate and fertility in these animals. Still, concerns remain regarding its long-term benefits and drawbacks. Therefore, we introduced artificial plants in our husbandry tanks, and evaluated over a one-year period if in our specific system the benefits would outweigh the risks. When we compared pairwise 16 tanks that were either non-enriched or enriched with artificial plants, we saw no significant difference in terms of zebrafish survival rate during rearing, sex ratio, fertility or pathogen burden. When analyzing zebrafish behavior in their 8 L home-tanks, we saw statistically significant avoidance of the area close to the plants and a place preference for the open water in the middle or opposite side of the tank. This effect got more pronounced at lower holding densities. In summary, we found that introducing structural enrichment to our specific zebrafish facility carried low cost and no detrimental effects for the animals but a reduction of their free-swimming space. At the same time benefits were difficult to determine in our readouts as the survival rates of our fish were already very high without structural enrichment. We would like to encourage others to prepare similar forms of facility reports regarding enrichment to ensure a broader discussion on their potential long-term benefits in zebrafish husbandry systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348591
Primary Topic
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction of artificial plants has no detrimental or beneficial effects on laboratory zebrafish husbandry but limits available swimming space

Jenny Wilzopolski, Nils Ohnesorge, Aymene Krachni, Richard Busch et al.
PLoS ONE
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
article

Introduction of artificial plants has no detrimental or beneficial effects on laboratory zebrafish husbandry but limits available swimming space

Jenny Wilzopolski, Nils Ohnesorge, Aymene Krachni, Richard Busch, Indigo Brakus, Angelina Schumann
article en

Abstract

There is a broad consensus that husbandry conditions of laboratory animals need constant improvement to guarantee optimal animal welfare and research data quality. Zebrafish ( Danio rerio ) as one of the main animal models in biomedicine and toxicology are currently kept in barren tanks in most experimental setups, as well as in animal husbandry. Structural enrichment with artificial plants is discussed at the moment as a potential refinement measure to provide a more diverse environment. Other reports have shown that this can reduce stress or anxiety and improve cognitive abilities, survival rate and fertility in these animals. Still, concerns remain regarding its long-term benefits and drawbacks. Therefore, we introduced artificial plants in our husbandry tanks, and evaluated over a one-year period if in our specific system the benefits would outweigh the risks. When we compared pairwise 16 tanks that were either non-enriched or enriched with artificial plants, we saw no significant difference in terms of zebrafish survival rate during rearing, sex ratio, fertility or pathogen burden. When analyzing zebrafish behavior in their 8 L home-tanks, we saw statistically significant avoidance of the area close to the plants and a place preference for the open water in the middle or opposite side of the tank. This effect got more pronounced at lower holding densities. In summary, we found that introducing structural enrichment to our specific zebrafish facility carried low cost and no detrimental effects for the animals but a reduction of their free-swimming space. At the same time benefits were difficult to determine in our readouts as the survival rates of our fish were already very high without structural enrichment. We would like to encourage others to prepare similar forms of facility reports regarding enrichment to ensure a broader discussion on their potential long-term benefits in zebrafish husbandry systems.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Introduction of artificial plants has no detrimental or beneficial effects on laboratory zebrafish husbandry but limits available swimming space — Jenny Wilzopolski, Nils Ohnesorge, et al. · PLoS ONE (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS