A digital self-care intervention for psychological distress associated with premenstrual syndrome: a fully online controlled trial using alternating allocation

Abstract Background Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is associated with significant psychological distress and productivity loss in women. This study aimed to evaluate whether a low-intensity digital intervention—comprising a symptom-tracking smartphone application and standardized informational emails—could reduce the psychological burden of PMS among women who self-identified as experiencing PMS. Methods We conducted a fully internet-based, open-label, parallel-group, nonrandomized controlled trial using centrally administered alternating allocation among women aged 18 years or older in Japan who self-identified as experiencing PMS. Participants were allocated alternately to either a 3-month intervention group (daily symptom tracking using a smartphone app and twice-weekly informational emails) or a waitlist control group. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in change scores on the psychological subscale of the Japanese version of the PMS-Impact Scale, measured from baseline to 3 months. Analyses were conducted per protocol. Results A total of 419 women were enrolled and assigned to either the intervention group (n = 210) or the waitlist control group ( n = 209). Of these, 355 participants were included in the per-protocol analysis. The intervention group showed greater improvement in self-reported psychological distress than the waitlist control group. The between-group difference in change score, defined as intervention minus control, was − 1.37 points (95% CI, − 2.47 to − 0.27; p = 0.015). Conclusions A simple, scalable digital intervention was associated with greater improvement in self-reported psychological distress among women who self-identified as experiencing PMS. These findings suggest that accessible, non–clinician-led tools may have potential as a self-management strategy for PMS, although causal interpretation is limited by the nonrandomized design. Trial registration This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) on September 26, 2022. Trial registration number: UMIN000048422.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04539-3
Primary Topic
Menstrual Health and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A digital self-care intervention for psychological distress associated with premenstrual syndrome: a fully online controlled trial using alternating allocation

Yoshimitsu Takahashi, Yumie Ikeda, Takuma Ohsuga, Masaki Mandai et al.
BMC Women s Health
Menstrual Health and Disorders
article

A digital self-care intervention for psychological distress associated with premenstrual syndrome: a fully online controlled trial using alternating allocation

Yoshimitsu Takahashi, Yumie Ikeda, Takuma Ohsuga, Masaki Mandai, Kaori Tsuyuki, Miho Egawa, Eiji Nakatani, Takeo Nakayama
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is associated with significant psychological distress and productivity loss in women. This study aimed to evaluate whether a low-intensity digital intervention—comprising a symptom-tracking smartphone application and standardized informational emails—could reduce the psychological burden of PMS among women who self-identified as experiencing PMS. Methods We conducted a fully internet-based, open-label, parallel-group, nonrandomized controlled trial using centrally administered alternating allocation among women aged 18 years or older in Japan who self-identified as experiencing PMS. Participants were allocated alternately to either a 3-month intervention group (daily symptom tracking using a smartphone app and twice-weekly informational emails) or a waitlist control group. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in change scores on the psychological subscale of the Japanese version of the PMS-Impact Scale, measured from baseline to 3 months. Analyses were conducted per protocol. Results A total of 419 women were enrolled and assigned to either the intervention group (n = 210) or the waitlist control group ( n = 209). Of these, 355 participants were included in the per-protocol analysis. The intervention group showed greater improvement in self-reported psychological distress than the waitlist control group. The between-group difference in change score, defined as intervention minus control, was − 1.37 points (95% CI, − 2.47 to − 0.27; p = 0.015). Conclusions A simple, scalable digital intervention was associated with greater improvement in self-reported psychological distress among women who self-identified as experiencing PMS. These findings suggest that accessible, non–clinician-led tools may have potential as a self-management strategy for PMS, although causal interpretation is limited by the nonrandomized design. Trial registration This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) on September 26, 2022. Trial registration number: UMIN000048422.

BMC Women s Health
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Menstrual Health and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.