Regional impacts on decarbonisation under evolving financing conditions for energy technologies

Abstract Energy-sector decarbonisation requires large-scale investment in low-carbon technologies, yet only a limited share flows to low- and middle-income countries, partly due to higher financing costs and perceived risks. Most modelling exercises do not fully account for how the cost of capital may vary across regions and technologies, potentially influencing policy insights. We examine how plausible, expert-informed long-term trends in de-risking clean energy and increasing risks for fossil fuels could shape decarbonisation pathways, using an empirical dataset differentiated by country and technology. We also evaluate a “corrective justice” policy that taxes corporate windfall profits and redistributes revenues to support low-carbon investments in higher-risk regions. Results suggest that incorporating differentiated cost-of-capital trajectories may improve mitigation outcomes and help narrow the gap between current commitments and long-term climate targets, while indicating potential underestimation of risks associated with bioenergy-based negative emissions technologies in mitigation scenarios for high-income nations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73522-1
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional impacts on decarbonisation under evolving financing conditions for energy technologies

Christoph Bertram, Anastasios Karamaneas, Αλέξανδρος Νίκας, Natasha Frilingou et al.
Nature Communications
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Regional impacts on decarbonisation under evolving financing conditions for energy technologies

Christoph Bertram, Anastasios Karamaneas, Αλέξανδρος Νίκας, Natasha Frilingou, Charalampos Platias, Dirk-Jan Van de Ven, Thomas Nikolakakis, Shivika Mittal, Clàudia Rodés-Bachs, Conall Heussaff, Kimon Georgiou, Konstantinos Koasidis, Russell Horowitz, Jon Sampedro
article en

Abstract

Abstract Energy-sector decarbonisation requires large-scale investment in low-carbon technologies, yet only a limited share flows to low- and middle-income countries, partly due to higher financing costs and perceived risks. Most modelling exercises do not fully account for how the cost of capital may vary across regions and technologies, potentially influencing policy insights. We examine how plausible, expert-informed long-term trends in de-risking clean energy and increasing risks for fossil fuels could shape decarbonisation pathways, using an empirical dataset differentiated by country and technology. We also evaluate a “corrective justice” policy that taxes corporate windfall profits and redistributes revenues to support low-carbon investments in higher-risk regions. Results suggest that incorporating differentiated cost-of-capital trajectories may improve mitigation outcomes and help narrow the gap between current commitments and long-term climate targets, while indicating potential underestimation of risks associated with bioenergy-based negative emissions technologies in mitigation scenarios for high-income nations.

Nature Communications
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.