Cardio-oncology research prioritisation in the United Kingdom: national surveys of health care professionals, patients and carers

Abstract Background The relevance of cardiovascular disease in people with a history of cancer has increased in parallel with dramatic improvements in cancer-specific outcomes. There is an urgent need to improve the evidence underpinning cardio-oncology practice. Research prioritisation is essential and needs to account for multidisciplinary healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives, as well as patients and carers. Methods The NIHR-BHF Cardiovascular Partnership Theme in Cardio-Oncology conducted two UK-wide online surveys to identify research priorities. The first was distributed to HCPs with cardiology, oncology and haemato-oncology backgrounds. The second was distributed to patients and carers (PCs) with experience of cancer and/or cardiovascular disease. Surveys were co-designed by clinicians and patients. Results HCP Survey: 127 responded; 53% prioritised research ‘during cancer treatment’. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies were identified as the highest-priority drug classes. Cardiac dysfunction/heart failure (53%) and myocarditis (22%) were priority cardiovascular toxicities of interest. The development of a cardio-oncology registry was marginally favoured over randomised trials. Prospective randomised open-label blinded endpoints (PROBE) designs were considered of similar priority to double-blinded placebo controlled trials. PC Survey: 267 responded. 54% were concerned about the impact of cancer treatment upon cardiovascular health. PC research priorities were: prevention of cardiac side effects (58%), long-term cardiac monitoring, and early detection of side effects. Willingness to participate in research was high. Conclusion HCPs and PCs from the UK prioritised prevention and detection of cardiac dysfunction during and immediately following cancer therapy, particularly with agents such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies. These findings provide important strategy-setting insights for large-scale collaborative cardio-oncology studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cardio-Oncology
Published
2026-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-026-00503-0
Primary Topic
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardio-oncology research prioritisation in the United Kingdom: national surveys of health care professionals, patients and carers

Ninian N. Lang, David J. Austin, John A. Snowden, Allyson Arnold et al.
Cardio-Oncology
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
article

Cardio-oncology research prioritisation in the United Kingdom: national surveys of health care professionals, patients and carers

Ninian N. Lang, David J. Austin, John A. Snowden, Allyson Arnold, Simon P. Fisher, Anna Olsson-Brown, Vasilena Zhecheva, Charlotte Manisty, Alison R Fielding, Keith Wilson, Christopher A Miller, Mark C Petrie, Nick Hartshorne-Evans, Gerard M Walls
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The relevance of cardiovascular disease in people with a history of cancer has increased in parallel with dramatic improvements in cancer-specific outcomes. There is an urgent need to improve the evidence underpinning cardio-oncology practice. Research prioritisation is essential and needs to account for multidisciplinary healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives, as well as patients and carers. Methods The NIHR-BHF Cardiovascular Partnership Theme in Cardio-Oncology conducted two UK-wide online surveys to identify research priorities. The first was distributed to HCPs with cardiology, oncology and haemato-oncology backgrounds. The second was distributed to patients and carers (PCs) with experience of cancer and/or cardiovascular disease. Surveys were co-designed by clinicians and patients. Results HCP Survey: 127 responded; 53% prioritised research ‘during cancer treatment’. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies were identified as the highest-priority drug classes. Cardiac dysfunction/heart failure (53%) and myocarditis (22%) were priority cardiovascular toxicities of interest. The development of a cardio-oncology registry was marginally favoured over randomised trials. Prospective randomised open-label blinded endpoints (PROBE) designs were considered of similar priority to double-blinded placebo controlled trials. PC Survey: 267 responded. 54% were concerned about the impact of cancer treatment upon cardiovascular health. PC research priorities were: prevention of cardiac side effects (58%), long-term cardiac monitoring, and early detection of side effects. Willingness to participate in research was high. Conclusion HCPs and PCs from the UK prioritised prevention and detection of cardiac dysfunction during and immediately following cancer therapy, particularly with agents such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies. These findings provide important strategy-setting insights for large-scale collaborative cardio-oncology studies.

Cardio-Oncology
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.