Artificial intelligence–based anatomical recognition improves surgeon decision-making during robotic gastrectomy

Abstract Background Artificial intelligence (AI)–based anatomical recognition has emerged to support intraoperative cognition; however, its clinical utility beyond education remains limited. This study aimed to develop an AI model for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection during robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) and evaluate its utility for intraoperative decision-making by surgeons. Methods We developed a deep learning model using 67 RDG videos (54 for training and 13 for testing) to recognize the pancreas, common hepatic artery (CHA), left gastric artery (LGA), and left gastric vein (LGV). Model performance was evaluated using Intersection over Union (IoU). Twenty surgeons participated in two experiments: experiment 1 assessed peritoneal incision line selection, rated by three experts on a 5-point scale, and experiment 2 assessed the time to CHA identification in a crossover design. Results The IoU values for the pancreas, CHA, LGA, and LGV were 0.66, 0.28, 0.216, and 0.232, respectively. In mixed-effects models, experiment 1 showed that AI assistance reduced the proportion of unsafe peritoneal incision lines (scores 1–2) compared with no assistance (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.41; P < 0.001) and improved the mean expert score by 0.64 points (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89; P < 0.001). In experiment 2, AI assistance reduced the time to CHA identification by 9.5 s (95% CI, 2.20 to 16.81; P = 0.0124). Conclusion Our AI system successfully supported surgeons’ intraoperative decision-making by improving anatomical recognition and thus can potentially enhance surgical safety.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gastric Cancer
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-026-01756-5
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence–based anatomical recognition improves surgeon decision-making during robotic gastrectomy

Gastric Cancer
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Artificial intelligence–based anatomical recognition improves surgeon decision-making during robotic gastrectomy

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Artificial intelligence (AI)–based anatomical recognition has emerged to support intraoperative cognition; however, its clinical utility beyond education remains limited. This study aimed to develop an AI model for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection during robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) and evaluate its utility for intraoperative decision-making by surgeons. Methods We developed a deep learning model using 67 RDG videos (54 for training and 13 for testing) to recognize the pancreas, common hepatic artery (CHA), left gastric artery (LGA), and left gastric vein (LGV). Model performance was evaluated using Intersection over Union (IoU). Twenty surgeons participated in two experiments: experiment 1 assessed peritoneal incision line selection, rated by three experts on a 5-point scale, and experiment 2 assessed the time to CHA identification in a crossover design. Results The IoU values for the pancreas, CHA, LGA, and LGV were 0.66, 0.28, 0.216, and 0.232, respectively. In mixed-effects models, experiment 1 showed that AI assistance reduced the proportion of unsafe peritoneal incision lines (scores 1–2) compared with no assistance (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.41; P < 0.001) and improved the mean expert score by 0.64 points (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89; P < 0.001). In experiment 2, AI assistance reduced the time to CHA identification by 9.5 s (95% CI, 2.20 to 16.81; P = 0.0124). Conclusion Our AI system successfully supported surgeons’ intraoperative decision-making by improving anatomical recognition and thus can potentially enhance surgical safety.

Gastric Cancer
Kanazawa University Hospital (JP), Keio University Hospital (JP), Engineering Advancement Association of Japan (JP)
Kanazawa University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.