Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Therapeutic Characterization of Multiple Myeloma Patients (CharisMMa Study) with Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Disease: An Observational, Multicenter Study in Portugal

Objectives: Real-world information on relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (rrMM) clinical management in Portugal is scarce. The CharisMMa Portugal study aimed to characterize rrMM patients through socio-demographic and clinical parameters and describe treatment patterns. Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study with 62 rrMM patients routinely treated at seven hospitals in Portugal. Data were collected from medical records during clinical appointments (2020–2022) after written informed consent was obtained (ClincialTrials.gov ID-NCT04135963). Patients who were diagnosed with a symptomatic MM episode in the 6 months prior to study initiation and who received treatment before their last relapse episode were enrolled. Results: Most patients were male (54.8%) and living with relatives (90.3%), and almost 50% were independent. Roughly 70% of patients were classified as Revised MM International Staging System (R-ISS) Stage II at diagnosis, with a mean age of 65.76 (±9.24) years old. Most common SliM-CRAB (SLIM: sixty percent or more clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow (S), light chain ratio ≥100 (Li), and MRI-detected focal lesions (M); CRAB: hypercalcemia (C), renal insufficiency (R), anemia (A), and bone lesions (B)) signs were bone lesions (59%), and 62.9% of the patients had at least one comorbidity. At study initiation, 70.5% of patients were on second-line treatment, with monoclonal antibodies and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) + immunomodulators (IMiDs) as leading agents. Triplet regimens were the most common across all lines, while oral and oral + subcutaneous were the most prevalent routes of administration. Conclusions: Triple treatment combinations are common in rrMM management, with PIs and IMiDs frequently used, especially in first-line settings. The use of oral formulation is substantial, suggesting a step toward more patient-centric options. This characterization underscores the complexity of rrMM management and should inform stakeholders of strategies to standardize patient care across reference centers in Portugal.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hematology Reports
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep18030034
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Therapeutic Characterization of Multiple Myeloma Patients (CharisMMa Study) with Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Disease: An Observational, Multicenter Study in Portugal

Hematology Reports
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Therapeutic Characterization of Multiple Myeloma Patients (CharisMMa Study) with Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Disease: An Observational, Multicenter Study in Portugal

article en

Abstract

Objectives: Real-world information on relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (rrMM) clinical management in Portugal is scarce. The CharisMMa Portugal study aimed to characterize rrMM patients through socio-demographic and clinical parameters and describe treatment patterns. Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study with 62 rrMM patients routinely treated at seven hospitals in Portugal. Data were collected from medical records during clinical appointments (2020–2022) after written informed consent was obtained (ClincialTrials.gov ID-NCT04135963). Patients who were diagnosed with a symptomatic MM episode in the 6 months prior to study initiation and who received treatment before their last relapse episode were enrolled. Results: Most patients were male (54.8%) and living with relatives (90.3%), and almost 50% were independent. Roughly 70% of patients were classified as Revised MM International Staging System (R-ISS) Stage II at diagnosis, with a mean age of 65.76 (±9.24) years old. Most common SliM-CRAB (SLIM: sixty percent or more clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow (S), light chain ratio ≥100 (Li), and MRI-detected focal lesions (M); CRAB: hypercalcemia (C), renal insufficiency (R), anemia (A), and bone lesions (B)) signs were bone lesions (59%), and 62.9% of the patients had at least one comorbidity. At study initiation, 70.5% of patients were on second-line treatment, with monoclonal antibodies and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) + immunomodulators (IMiDs) as leading agents. Triplet regimens were the most common across all lines, while oral and oral + subcutaneous were the most prevalent routes of administration. Conclusions: Triple treatment combinations are common in rrMM management, with PIs and IMiDs frequently used, especially in first-line settings. The use of oral formulation is substantial, suggesting a step toward more patient-centric options. This characterization underscores the complexity of rrMM management and should inform stakeholders of strategies to standardize patient care across reference centers in Portugal.

Hematology ReportsVol. 18(3)
University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade do Porto (PT), Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (PT), Hospital de São João (PT), Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Coimbra (PT), Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT), IPO Porto (PT), Hospital de Santo António (PT), Centre for Health Technology and Services Research (PT), Hospital Braga (PT), Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia (PT), Estrutura de Missão para a Extensão da Plataforma Continental (PT), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil (PT), Hospital de Santa Maria (PT), i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto (PT), Clinical Academic Center of Braga (PT), University of Coimbra (PT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.