Cultural and psychological mechanisms explaining the relationship between supervisor incivility and hospitality employees’ work engagement

Purpose Much research has predominantly focused on customer incivility in hospitality management literature. This research proposes a conceptual framework to examine how supervisors’ power distance orientation impacts employees’ perceptions of supervisory incivility, a sense of helplessness, and their work engagement. Psychological distress was hypothesized to intensify the helplessness-engagement relationship. Design/methodology/approach Through the integration of Conservation of Resources and Social Information Processing theories, we employed a dyadic approach to collect from 200 matched responses between frontline hotel service employees and their direct supervisors from Chinese hotels. Findings We find a sequential mediation mechanism showing a positive association between supervisors’ power distance orientation and supervisor incivility rated by employees, which increases learned helplessness and subsequently decreases work engagement. Psychological distress significantly strengthens the learned helplessness-work engagement relationship, amplifying negative outcomes of supervisor incivility. Originality/value Our study contributes to an underexplored stream of culturally sensitive research by demonstrating how supervisors’ power distance orientation – deeply embedded in cultural norms – shapes employees’ perceptions of supervisor incivility and its consequences in hospitality settings. It advances cultural psychology in hospitality management by identifying individual-level power distance orientation as a driver of supervisory incivility. It also positions the interplay of learned helplessness and psychological distress as psychological conditions intensifying the adverse impact of supervisor incivility on frontline service employees’ work engagement. The findings generate novel ideas for psychologically and culturally attuned leadership training practices and mental health interventions within the high emotional labor settings.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Service Theory and Practice
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-10-2025-0394
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural and psychological mechanisms explaining the relationship between supervisor incivility and hospitality employees’ work engagement

Journal of Service Theory and Practice
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

Cultural and psychological mechanisms explaining the relationship between supervisor incivility and hospitality employees’ work engagement

article en

Abstract

Purpose Much research has predominantly focused on customer incivility in hospitality management literature. This research proposes a conceptual framework to examine how supervisors’ power distance orientation impacts employees’ perceptions of supervisory incivility, a sense of helplessness, and their work engagement. Psychological distress was hypothesized to intensify the helplessness-engagement relationship. Design/methodology/approach Through the integration of Conservation of Resources and Social Information Processing theories, we employed a dyadic approach to collect from 200 matched responses between frontline hotel service employees and their direct supervisors from Chinese hotels. Findings We find a sequential mediation mechanism showing a positive association between supervisors’ power distance orientation and supervisor incivility rated by employees, which increases learned helplessness and subsequently decreases work engagement. Psychological distress significantly strengthens the learned helplessness-work engagement relationship, amplifying negative outcomes of supervisor incivility. Originality/value Our study contributes to an underexplored stream of culturally sensitive research by demonstrating how supervisors’ power distance orientation – deeply embedded in cultural norms – shapes employees’ perceptions of supervisor incivility and its consequences in hospitality settings. It advances cultural psychology in hospitality management by identifying individual-level power distance orientation as a driver of supervisory incivility. It also positions the interplay of learned helplessness and psychological distress as psychological conditions intensifying the adverse impact of supervisor incivility on frontline service employees’ work engagement. The findings generate novel ideas for psychologically and culturally attuned leadership training practices and mental health interventions within the high emotional labor settings.

Journal of Service Theory and Practice
Macau University of Science and Technology (MO), Under Armour (United States) (US), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.