Responsible artificial intelligence in human resource management: a conceptual framework for managing ethical and legal risks

Purpose This paper develops a conceptual framework for managing the ethical and legal risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in human resource management (HRM). It extends HRM theory by linking fairness, accountability and transparency to technological adoption. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a conceptual synthesis based on a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature and selected policy frameworks. It integrates the technology acceptance model (TAM), fairness-accountability-transparency (FAT) principles and stakeholder theory to connect risk domains with adoption mechanisms. Findings The synthesis identifies five ethical and five legal risk domains that shape governance expectations for AI in HRM. The framework explains how ethical governance and legal compliance shape trust, perceived usefulness, perceived risk and responsible adoption intentions. Practical implications The framework provides HR leaders and policymakers with governance guidance for embedding ethical safeguards and legal compliance into AI-enabled HR practices. Originality/value This paper contributes to HRM theory by specifying a governance-to-acceptance pathway for responsible AI in HRM. It links FAT governance perceptions to trust and then to TAM beliefs and responsible adoption intentions within one integrated model.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-11-2025-1042
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsible artificial intelligence in human resource management: a conceptual framework for managing ethical and legal risks

Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Responsible artificial intelligence in human resource management: a conceptual framework for managing ethical and legal risks

article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper develops a conceptual framework for managing the ethical and legal risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in human resource management (HRM). It extends HRM theory by linking fairness, accountability and transparency to technological adoption. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a conceptual synthesis based on a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature and selected policy frameworks. It integrates the technology acceptance model (TAM), fairness-accountability-transparency (FAT) principles and stakeholder theory to connect risk domains with adoption mechanisms. Findings The synthesis identifies five ethical and five legal risk domains that shape governance expectations for AI in HRM. The framework explains how ethical governance and legal compliance shape trust, perceived usefulness, perceived risk and responsible adoption intentions. Practical implications The framework provides HR leaders and policymakers with governance guidance for embedding ethical safeguards and legal compliance into AI-enabled HR practices. Originality/value This paper contributes to HRM theory by specifying a governance-to-acceptance pathway for responsible AI in HRM. It links FAT governance perceptions to trust and then to TAM beliefs and responsible adoption intentions within one integrated model.

Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance
Woxsen School of Business (IN), Centerforce (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.