Economic inequality and social mobility in preindustrial societies: What we know, what we don't (but should) know

Abstract In recent years economic inequality has become a major research topic in economic history. However, much remains to be done to complete our knowledge of long‐term distributive dynamics. This article highlights several promising avenues for future research, focusing on the preindustrial period. In particular, it identifies the main gaps that still need to be filled in reconstructions of wealth and income distributions; it argues for a closer interaction between scholars working on economic inequality and those working on historical gross domestic product (GDP); and it highlights socio‐economic mobility as a closely related, but much less explored, research area. Shifting the focus from inequality to mobility, and more generally considering how human agency helped shape the aggregate long‐term dynamics we observe, requires examining individual actors and their specific motivations more closely. This is especially true for the socio‐economic elites who, when faced with a perceived threat of status loss, could attempt to capture political institutions, thus securing their control over valuable public resources, whilst at the same time acting as ‘enemies of mobility’. The article also highlights how this kind of research speaks directly to current societal concerns.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic History Review
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.70122
Primary Topic
Historical Economic and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic inequality and social mobility in preindustrial societies: What we know, what we don't (but should) know

The Economic History Review
Historical Economic and Social Studies
article

Economic inequality and social mobility in preindustrial societies: What we know, what we don't (but should) know

article en

Abstract

Abstract In recent years economic inequality has become a major research topic in economic history. However, much remains to be done to complete our knowledge of long‐term distributive dynamics. This article highlights several promising avenues for future research, focusing on the preindustrial period. In particular, it identifies the main gaps that still need to be filled in reconstructions of wealth and income distributions; it argues for a closer interaction between scholars working on economic inequality and those working on historical gross domestic product (GDP); and it highlights socio‐economic mobility as a closely related, but much less explored, research area. Shifting the focus from inequality to mobility, and more generally considering how human agency helped shape the aggregate long‐term dynamics we observe, requires examining individual actors and their specific motivations more closely. This is especially true for the socio‐economic elites who, when faced with a perceived threat of status loss, could attempt to capture political institutions, thus securing their control over valuable public resources, whilst at the same time acting as ‘enemies of mobility’. The article also highlights how this kind of research speaks directly to current societal concerns.

The Economic History Review
City University of New York (US), University of Chicago (US), Bocconi University (IT)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Historical Economic and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.