Asynchrony index modified: An improved tool for estimating the quality of patient-ventilator interaction

Background Patient–ventilator asynchronies are a common occurrence among patients receiving ventilatory support. Their clinical relevance has been explored for decades, most often through the Asynchrony Index, a simple and widely applicable tool. However, this index, it seems, may have some limitations and might not fully capture recent advances in understanding ventilatory asynchronies. Methods Propose a novel index, the Asynchrony Index Modified (AIM), as an alternative conceptual approach intended to better reflect current understanding in this field. This index incorporates additional dimensions, including the type, intensity, and duration of asynchrony events, which could allow for a more nuanced estimation of the overall burden of patient–ventilator mismatch. Results The AIM is conceived as a practical, non-invasive, and reproducible tool that can be applied at the bedside. The AIM could be quantified and may provide a complementary approach for exploring differences between distinct types of patient–ventilator asynchrony, with possible variation according to exposure time and asynchrony intensity. Conclusion The AIM is consistent with the principles of precision mechanical ventilation and may represent a step forward in adapting assessment strategies to the evolving understanding of patient–ventilator asynchronies. However, it is important to consider that this proposal is based on a conceptual model, and further research may be necessary to evaluate the AIM, explore its clinical applicability, and establish clinically relevant cutoff values.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29390/001c.161382
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asynchrony index modified: An improved tool for estimating the quality of patient-ventilator interaction

Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Asynchrony index modified: An improved tool for estimating the quality of patient-ventilator interaction

article en

Abstract

Background Patient–ventilator asynchronies are a common occurrence among patients receiving ventilatory support. Their clinical relevance has been explored for decades, most often through the Asynchrony Index, a simple and widely applicable tool. However, this index, it seems, may have some limitations and might not fully capture recent advances in understanding ventilatory asynchronies. Methods Propose a novel index, the Asynchrony Index Modified (AIM), as an alternative conceptual approach intended to better reflect current understanding in this field. This index incorporates additional dimensions, including the type, intensity, and duration of asynchrony events, which could allow for a more nuanced estimation of the overall burden of patient–ventilator mismatch. Results The AIM is conceived as a practical, non-invasive, and reproducible tool that can be applied at the bedside. The AIM could be quantified and may provide a complementary approach for exploring differences between distinct types of patient–ventilator asynchrony, with possible variation according to exposure time and asynchrony intensity. Conclusion The AIM is consistent with the principles of precision mechanical ventilation and may represent a step forward in adapting assessment strategies to the evolving understanding of patient–ventilator asynchronies. However, it is important to consider that this proposal is based on a conceptual model, and further research may be necessary to evaluate the AIM, explore its clinical applicability, and establish clinically relevant cutoff values.

Canadian Journal of Respiratory TherapyVol. 62
University of Caldas (CO), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.