Subordination of related party claims in insolvency: A suggestive framework for Asian regimes

Abstract Related party loans, due to their inherent nature, warrant a higher threshold for scrutiny when compared to loans extended by unrelated parties. Why were these monies advanced as loans, carrying higher priority in insolvency, rather than being invested as share capital? Even though such loans might be regarded as having an underlying presumption of self‐interest, all related party loans are not mala fide, and many may serve genuine business needs that benefit the debtor and other stakeholders. Some jurisdictions, such as the United States, take into account these equitable considerations to evaluate whether related party claims warrant subordination in the order of priority during liquidation; while other jurisdictions, such as Germany, automatically subordinate these claims. Notably, Asian jurisdictions exhibit a regulatory vacuum, characterised by the absence of a statutory framework and minimal judicial guidance for subordination of related party claims in insolvency proceedings. The paper argues that a related‐party subordination regime ought to be quintessential in the Asian context, as these regions are characterised by family‐owned business and conglomerates wherein intra‐group lending is prevalent. While bona fide related‐party lending can benefit businesses, external investors may be deterred by uncertainty about the priority of their claims relative to related‐party creditors who could exploit insider status in insolvency. With Asia now approaching a 50% contribution to global GDP, it is imperative to keep up with global standards of creditor protection and legal predictability. In light of this, the paper examines the subordination regimes of the United States, Germany, Spain, and Italy, to ultimately propose a model for Asian countries to enhance creditor confidence and legal certainty with respect to subordination of related party claims, while avoiding overly restrictive rules that could deter legitimate business activity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Insolvency Review
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.70045
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subordination of related party claims in insolvency: A suggestive framework for Asian regimes

International Insolvency Review
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Subordination of related party claims in insolvency: A suggestive framework for Asian regimes

article en

Abstract

Abstract Related party loans, due to their inherent nature, warrant a higher threshold for scrutiny when compared to loans extended by unrelated parties. Why were these monies advanced as loans, carrying higher priority in insolvency, rather than being invested as share capital? Even though such loans might be regarded as having an underlying presumption of self‐interest, all related party loans are not mala fide, and many may serve genuine business needs that benefit the debtor and other stakeholders. Some jurisdictions, such as the United States, take into account these equitable considerations to evaluate whether related party claims warrant subordination in the order of priority during liquidation; while other jurisdictions, such as Germany, automatically subordinate these claims. Notably, Asian jurisdictions exhibit a regulatory vacuum, characterised by the absence of a statutory framework and minimal judicial guidance for subordination of related party claims in insolvency proceedings. The paper argues that a related‐party subordination regime ought to be quintessential in the Asian context, as these regions are characterised by family‐owned business and conglomerates wherein intra‐group lending is prevalent. While bona fide related‐party lending can benefit businesses, external investors may be deterred by uncertainty about the priority of their claims relative to related‐party creditors who could exploit insider status in insolvency. With Asia now approaching a 50% contribution to global GDP, it is imperative to keep up with global standards of creditor protection and legal predictability. In light of this, the paper examines the subordination regimes of the United States, Germany, Spain, and Italy, to ultimately propose a model for Asian countries to enhance creditor confidence and legal certainty with respect to subordination of related party claims, while avoiding overly restrictive rules that could deter legitimate business activity.

International Insolvency Review
Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law (IN), Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.