Civil ordering, antiracism and the dilemmatic promise of racial eliminativism

This article theorises racial eliminativism and civil ordering operating in combination as ongoing processes to eradicate race and counteract racism. Racial eliminativism and civil ordering are initially explicated as complementary ideational and institutional provisions. The paper then develops this interchange between racial eliminativism and civil order in three sections. Section 1 assesses the salience of legal definitions of race and its status as a protected characteristic, questioning whether protection should be afforded to racial persons or against racism. Section 2 examines the implications of defining and addressing abuse in racial terms. This is then related to civil order focusing on criminalising racist abuse. Section 3 evaluates the coherence of racial justice. Instead, the article raises the objective of pursuing antiracist justice in relation to civil ordering. In conclusion, the article advocates using racial eliminativism in conjunction with civil ordering to deliver an authentic form of social justice to all citizens.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social & Legal Studies
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639261451425
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Civil ordering, antiracism and the dilemmatic promise of racial eliminativism

Social & Legal Studies
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
article

Civil ordering, antiracism and the dilemmatic promise of racial eliminativism

article en

Abstract

This article theorises racial eliminativism and civil ordering operating in combination as ongoing processes to eradicate race and counteract racism. Racial eliminativism and civil ordering are initially explicated as complementary ideational and institutional provisions. The paper then develops this interchange between racial eliminativism and civil order in three sections. Section 1 assesses the salience of legal definitions of race and its status as a protected characteristic, questioning whether protection should be afforded to racial persons or against racism. Section 2 examines the implications of defining and addressing abuse in racial terms. This is then related to civil order focusing on criminalising racist abuse. Section 3 evaluates the coherence of racial justice. Instead, the article raises the objective of pursuing antiracist justice in relation to civil ordering. In conclusion, the article advocates using racial eliminativism in conjunction with civil ordering to deliver an authentic form of social justice to all citizens.

Social & Legal Studies
University of Manchester (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.