Interactive artificial intelligence in airway management: Debunking myths through a comparison of Google Gemini and ChatGPT

Abstract Airway management is a core skill in the field of anaesthesia which is faced with emergent decisions and life long learning. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of AI chatbots, ChatGPT and Google Gemini in assisting such difficult airway conditions. The set of 20 MCQ was appropriately and systematically drafted in accordance with standard guidelines by two senior anaesthesiologists. The MCQs were were put to test in each chatbot separately. The responses generated were noted and statistical analysis done (sensitivity and positive predictive value). No statistically significant difference was noted between the performance of ChatGPT and Google Gemini (p-value ≈0.718), former being marginally better than the latter. These chatbots are still in their novice stage and need more validation and should be used only as an adjunct in the current scenario.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_419_25
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interactive artificial intelligence in airway management: Debunking myths through a comparison of Google Gemini and ChatGPT

Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Interactive artificial intelligence in airway management: Debunking myths through a comparison of Google Gemini and ChatGPT

article en

Abstract

Abstract Airway management is a core skill in the field of anaesthesia which is faced with emergent decisions and life long learning. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of AI chatbots, ChatGPT and Google Gemini in assisting such difficult airway conditions. The set of 20 MCQ was appropriately and systematically drafted in accordance with standard guidelines by two senior anaesthesiologists. The MCQs were were put to test in each chatbot separately. The responses generated were noted and statistical analysis done (sensitivity and positive predictive value). No statistically significant difference was noted between the performance of ChatGPT and Google Gemini (p-value ≈0.718), former being marginally better than the latter. These chatbots are still in their novice stage and need more validation and should be used only as an adjunct in the current scenario.

Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
University College of Medical Sciences (IN), Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.