Do Sustainability Committees Mitigate or Exacerbate ESG Decoupling?

ABSTRACT This study investigates the impact of sustainability committees (SCs) on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) decoupling in US publicly listed firms. In particular, it examines their influence on overall and dimension‐specific (E, S, G) ESG decoupling and distinguishes their effects on internal versus external ESG actions. The study also tests whether external monitoring factors, including analyst coverage, institutional ownership, and media scrutiny, moderate the relationship between SCs and ESG decoupling. Using a sample of 2759 firms with 20,038 firm‐year observations from 2002 to 2021, we find that an SC significantly increases overall ESG decoupling, indicating that firms with SCs tend to disclose more external ESG claims without corresponding improvements in internal ESG practices. Dimension‐specific analyses show that SCs reduce environmental decoupling but increase social and governance decoupling, highlighting heterogeneous effects across ESG dimensions. Moderation analysis shows that analyst coverage strengthens ESG decoupling, institutional ownership mitigates it, and media scrutiny exerts mixed effects across ESG dimensions. Overall, the findings suggest that SCs promote symbolic rather than substantive ESG practices, thus exacerbating ESG decoupling, particularly in social and governance domains.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70976
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Sustainability Committees Mitigate or Exacerbate ESG Decoupling?

Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Do Sustainability Committees Mitigate or Exacerbate ESG Decoupling?

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the impact of sustainability committees (SCs) on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) decoupling in US publicly listed firms. In particular, it examines their influence on overall and dimension‐specific (E, S, G) ESG decoupling and distinguishes their effects on internal versus external ESG actions. The study also tests whether external monitoring factors, including analyst coverage, institutional ownership, and media scrutiny, moderate the relationship between SCs and ESG decoupling. Using a sample of 2759 firms with 20,038 firm‐year observations from 2002 to 2021, we find that an SC significantly increases overall ESG decoupling, indicating that firms with SCs tend to disclose more external ESG claims without corresponding improvements in internal ESG practices. Dimension‐specific analyses show that SCs reduce environmental decoupling but increase social and governance decoupling, highlighting heterogeneous effects across ESG dimensions. Moderation analysis shows that analyst coverage strengthens ESG decoupling, institutional ownership mitigates it, and media scrutiny exerts mixed effects across ESG dimensions. Overall, the findings suggest that SCs promote symbolic rather than substantive ESG practices, thus exacerbating ESG decoupling, particularly in social and governance domains.

Business Strategy and the Environment
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.