The Impact Mechanisms of ESG Ratings on Corporate Green Technology Innovation: A Multi-Period Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Innovation Quantity, Quality, and Efficiency

This study examines the causal impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings on corporate green technology innovation using a panel of Saudi listed firms over the period 2015–2024. Adopting a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) framework, the analysis evaluates three dimensions of innovation outcomes—quantity, quality, and efficiency (CGTI1–CGTI3). The results show that ESG ratings significantly enhance green technology innovation. Dynamic evidence indicates that these effects strengthen over time, reflecting gradual adjustment in firms’ innovation strategies. Mechanism analysis reveals that ESG ratings promote innovation primarily by alleviating financial constraints and mitigating agency problems. These effects are driven by improvements in the information environment, as ESG ratings reduce information asymmetry and enhance monitoring. From a theoretical perspective, ESG ratings are conceptualized as a digital information infrastructure that reduces informational entropy and provides algorithmic evaluation signals, thereby guiding managerial decision-making in R&D investment and project selection. Robustness tests, including propensity score matching difference-in-differences (PSM-DID), confirm that the results are not driven by selection bias. Focusing on Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030, the findings highlight the role of ESG information systems in shaping green innovation in an emerging market context.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105094
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact Mechanisms of ESG Ratings on Corporate Green Technology Innovation: A Multi-Period Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Innovation Quantity, Quality, and Efficiency

Sustainability
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

The Impact Mechanisms of ESG Ratings on Corporate Green Technology Innovation: A Multi-Period Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Innovation Quantity, Quality, and Efficiency

article en

Abstract

This study examines the causal impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings on corporate green technology innovation using a panel of Saudi listed firms over the period 2015–2024. Adopting a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) framework, the analysis evaluates three dimensions of innovation outcomes—quantity, quality, and efficiency (CGTI1–CGTI3). The results show that ESG ratings significantly enhance green technology innovation. Dynamic evidence indicates that these effects strengthen over time, reflecting gradual adjustment in firms’ innovation strategies. Mechanism analysis reveals that ESG ratings promote innovation primarily by alleviating financial constraints and mitigating agency problems. These effects are driven by improvements in the information environment, as ESG ratings reduce information asymmetry and enhance monitoring. From a theoretical perspective, ESG ratings are conceptualized as a digital information infrastructure that reduces informational entropy and provides algorithmic evaluation signals, thereby guiding managerial decision-making in R&D investment and project selection. Robustness tests, including propensity score matching difference-in-differences (PSM-DID), confirm that the results are not driven by selection bias. Focusing on Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030, the findings highlight the role of ESG information systems in shaping green innovation in an emerging market context.

SustainabilityVol. 18(10)
Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.