Risk Factors for Acute Kidney Injury After Surgery for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. We searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Proquest, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature databases from inception to January 2026. A total of 58 case-control studies were included, assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis identified numerous significant perioperative factors. Key demographic and preoperative risk factors included age, body mass index, hypertension history, preoperative renal insufficiency, elevated cystatin C, lactate, serum creatinine, white blood cell count, and renal malperfusion, while a higher left ventricular ejection fraction was protective. Intraoperative factors such as prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time, increased red blood cell transfusion, and total aortic arch replacement increased AKI risk, whereas higher intraoperative urine output was protective. Postoperatively, prolonged mechanical ventilation and acute respiratory insufficiency were also high-risk factors. In conclusion, multiple preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors significantly influence AKI risk following Stanford type A aortic dissection surgery. Comprehensive perioperative assessment of these factors may help clinicians implement targeted management to reduce AKI incidence and improve patient outcomes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology in Review
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001313
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Factors for Acute Kidney Injury After Surgery for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cardiology in Review
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Risk Factors for Acute Kidney Injury After Surgery for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

article en

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. We searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Proquest, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature databases from inception to January 2026. A total of 58 case-control studies were included, assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis identified numerous significant perioperative factors. Key demographic and preoperative risk factors included age, body mass index, hypertension history, preoperative renal insufficiency, elevated cystatin C, lactate, serum creatinine, white blood cell count, and renal malperfusion, while a higher left ventricular ejection fraction was protective. Intraoperative factors such as prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time, increased red blood cell transfusion, and total aortic arch replacement increased AKI risk, whereas higher intraoperative urine output was protective. Postoperatively, prolonged mechanical ventilation and acute respiratory insufficiency were also high-risk factors. In conclusion, multiple preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors significantly influence AKI risk following Stanford type A aortic dissection surgery. Comprehensive perioperative assessment of these factors may help clinicians implement targeted management to reduce AKI incidence and improve patient outcomes.

Cardiology in Review
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.