Intimacy Needs Across Different Relationship Types: The Role of Gender and Attachment Style

Abstract In this study, we examined five different intimacy needs (i.e., emotional, social, sexual, intellectual, and recreational) across several types of modern-day romantic relationships (i.e., committed, friends with benefits, one-night-stands, and polyamorous) among undergraduates ( N = 240). Overall, individuals rated emotional needs as most important and social needs as least important to a fulfilling partnership. Additionally, they expected committed partners to meet 81% of their total intimacy needs but other types of partners to meet far fewer (i.e., one-night stands = 20%, friends with benefits = 35%, polyamorous = 50%). Men and women rated intimacy needs similarly across most relationship types; however, attachment and attachment x gender emerged as significant predictors of intimacy needs. Specifically, men who were anxiously attached had fewer sexual need expectations across most relationship types, while anxiously attached women had more sexual need expectations, but only in polyamorous relationships. Meanwhile, within committed relationships, men and women who were more avoidantly attached had fewer need expectations across all categories of intimacy. Combined, these results suggest that young adult men and women have similar expectations regarding intimate exchanges, but gender and attachment orientation influence variations in these expectations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexuality & Culture
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-026-10570-1
Primary Topic
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intimacy Needs Across Different Relationship Types: The Role of Gender and Attachment Style

Sexuality & Culture
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
article

Intimacy Needs Across Different Relationship Types: The Role of Gender and Attachment Style

article en

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we examined five different intimacy needs (i.e., emotional, social, sexual, intellectual, and recreational) across several types of modern-day romantic relationships (i.e., committed, friends with benefits, one-night-stands, and polyamorous) among undergraduates ( N = 240). Overall, individuals rated emotional needs as most important and social needs as least important to a fulfilling partnership. Additionally, they expected committed partners to meet 81% of their total intimacy needs but other types of partners to meet far fewer (i.e., one-night stands = 20%, friends with benefits = 35%, polyamorous = 50%). Men and women rated intimacy needs similarly across most relationship types; however, attachment and attachment x gender emerged as significant predictors of intimacy needs. Specifically, men who were anxiously attached had fewer sexual need expectations across most relationship types, while anxiously attached women had more sexual need expectations, but only in polyamorous relationships. Meanwhile, within committed relationships, men and women who were more avoidantly attached had fewer need expectations across all categories of intimacy. Combined, these results suggest that young adult men and women have similar expectations regarding intimate exchanges, but gender and attachment orientation influence variations in these expectations.

Sexuality & Culture
Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne (US), Ball State University (US), Miller College (US), Purdue University Fort Wayne (US), Parkview Health (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.