Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure levels on splanchnic perfusion and intra-abdominal pressure: a prospective clinical-experimental study in lung-healthy patients

Abstract Background High levels of airway pressure and especially positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been reported to reduce splanchnic perfusion and consequently lead to organ damage. We evaluated the effect of increasing PEEP levels on splanchnic perfusion and intra-abdominal pressure in a prospective clinical-experimental trial. Methods In 20 neurosurgical patients, who were admitted to ICU due to the risk of postoperative complications, we measured the renal and splenic Doppler resistance index (RRI and SRI), intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and the venous impedance index (VII) at different levels of PEEP (5 to 15 cmH 2 O) using a non-invasive ultrasound technique. Results Twenty patients were included in the final analysis. All RRI and SRI values remained within the reference range throughout the protocol, with low measurement variability (SD: RRI 0.06; SRI 0.09; VII 0.22). As PEEP levels increased from 5 to 15 cmH₂O, peak and plateau pressures rose significantly, while driving pressure remained constant. Differences between PEEP levels were not significant for IAP ( η 2 G = 0.011, p = 0.298), RRI ( η 2 G = 0.034, p = 0.253), SRI ( η 2 G = 0.008, p = 0.719), or VII ( η 2 G = 0.015, p = 0.070). No significant correlations with PEEP were found for RRI ( r =−0.179, p = 0.081) or SRI ( r = −0.130, p = 0.205). Mean arterial pressure was stable (84 ± 11 mmHg) and did not correlate with RRI ( r = 0.195, p = 0.106), but correlated with SRI ( r = 0.250, p = 0.037) and IAP ( r = 0.275, p = 0.022). Exploratory mixed-effects models suggested a modest effect of PEEP on RRI (−0.002, p = 0.036) and a significant effect on VII (−0.007, p = 0.003), though patient-specific factors dominated the variance ( R 2 c = 0.60–0.91). Conclusion In our cohort of mechanically ventilated, hemodynamically stable, non–fluid-responsive, healthy patients, we found no effect of increasing PEEP levels on intra-abdominal pressure or surrogates of splanchnic perfusion, but an increase in renal venous drainage at higher PEEP levels; these findings warrant confirmation in larger samples. Trial registration The study was registered in the German clinical trials register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00023895 on 15.02.2021).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Anesthesia Analgesia and Critical Care
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00411-w
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure levels on splanchnic perfusion and intra-abdominal pressure: a prospective clinical-experimental study in lung-healthy patients

Journal of Anesthesia Analgesia and Critical Care
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure levels on splanchnic perfusion and intra-abdominal pressure: a prospective clinical-experimental study in lung-healthy patients

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background High levels of airway pressure and especially positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been reported to reduce splanchnic perfusion and consequently lead to organ damage. We evaluated the effect of increasing PEEP levels on splanchnic perfusion and intra-abdominal pressure in a prospective clinical-experimental trial. Methods In 20 neurosurgical patients, who were admitted to ICU due to the risk of postoperative complications, we measured the renal and splenic Doppler resistance index (RRI and SRI), intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and the venous impedance index (VII) at different levels of PEEP (5 to 15 cmH 2 O) using a non-invasive ultrasound technique. Results Twenty patients were included in the final analysis. All RRI and SRI values remained within the reference range throughout the protocol, with low measurement variability (SD: RRI 0.06; SRI 0.09; VII 0.22). As PEEP levels increased from 5 to 15 cmH₂O, peak and plateau pressures rose significantly, while driving pressure remained constant. Differences between PEEP levels were not significant for IAP ( η 2 G = 0.011, p = 0.298), RRI ( η 2 G = 0.034, p = 0.253), SRI ( η 2 G = 0.008, p = 0.719), or VII ( η 2 G = 0.015, p = 0.070). No significant correlations with PEEP were found for RRI ( r =−0.179, p = 0.081) or SRI ( r = −0.130, p = 0.205). Mean arterial pressure was stable (84 ± 11 mmHg) and did not correlate with RRI ( r = 0.195, p = 0.106), but correlated with SRI ( r = 0.250, p = 0.037) and IAP ( r = 0.275, p = 0.022). Exploratory mixed-effects models suggested a modest effect of PEEP on RRI (−0.002, p = 0.036) and a significant effect on VII (−0.007, p = 0.003), though patient-specific factors dominated the variance ( R 2 c = 0.60–0.91). Conclusion In our cohort of mechanically ventilated, hemodynamically stable, non–fluid-responsive, healthy patients, we found no effect of increasing PEEP levels on intra-abdominal pressure or surrogates of splanchnic perfusion, but an increase in renal venous drainage at higher PEEP levels; these findings warrant confirmation in larger samples. Trial registration The study was registered in the German clinical trials register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00023895 on 15.02.2021).

Journal of Anesthesia Analgesia and Critical CareVol. 6(1)
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.