Controlled Conjugate CFD Comparison of Counter-Flow and Parallel-Flow Concentric Tube Heat Exchangers Under Identical Reynolds Conditions for Engine Cooling and Waste Heat Recovery

This study presents a controlled three-dimensional conjugate CFD comparison of counter-flow and parallel-flow concentric tube heat exchangers under identical Reynolds number conditions (Re = 1000–2000). By isolating the flow configuration as the only varying parameter, the intrinsic influence of flow arrangement on thermo-hydraulic performance is systematically evaluated. Unlike enhancement-focused studies involving geometric modification or advanced working fluids, the present study focuses exclusively on the influence of flow arrangement under identical operating conditions. The analysis focuses on heat transfer rate, outlet temperature distribution, pressure drop, thermo-hydraulic performance index, and a normalized heat transfer ratio (Ψ). The results show that the counter-flow configuration consistently enhances heat transfer by 3.17–4.29% compared to parallel-flow operation, while maintaining nearly identical pressure-drop values. This improvement is attributed to the preservation of a higher logarithmic mean temperature difference (LMTD) along the exchanger length, sustaining the thermal driving force under laminar flow conditions. In contrast, the parallel-flow configuration exhibits a rapid decay in temperature difference near the inlet region, limiting effective heat transfer. Although heat transfer increases with Reynolds number in both configurations, the thermo-hydraulic performance index decreases due to the relatively higher increase in hydraulic resistance. Comparison with classical laminar flow behavior confirmed the physical consistency and reliability of the numerical model. The findings demonstrate that counter-flow arrangement provides a measurable thermal advantage without additional hydraulic penalty. The study offers a physically consistent and practically relevant framework for the design and optimization of concentric tube heat exchangers used in engine cooling and waste heat recovery applications.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101641
Primary Topic
Heat Transfer and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Controlled Conjugate CFD Comparison of Counter-Flow and Parallel-Flow Concentric Tube Heat Exchangers Under Identical Reynolds Conditions for Engine Cooling and Waste Heat Recovery

Processes
Heat Transfer and Optimization
article

Controlled Conjugate CFD Comparison of Counter-Flow and Parallel-Flow Concentric Tube Heat Exchangers Under Identical Reynolds Conditions for Engine Cooling and Waste Heat Recovery

article en

Abstract

This study presents a controlled three-dimensional conjugate CFD comparison of counter-flow and parallel-flow concentric tube heat exchangers under identical Reynolds number conditions (Re = 1000–2000). By isolating the flow configuration as the only varying parameter, the intrinsic influence of flow arrangement on thermo-hydraulic performance is systematically evaluated. Unlike enhancement-focused studies involving geometric modification or advanced working fluids, the present study focuses exclusively on the influence of flow arrangement under identical operating conditions. The analysis focuses on heat transfer rate, outlet temperature distribution, pressure drop, thermo-hydraulic performance index, and a normalized heat transfer ratio (Ψ). The results show that the counter-flow configuration consistently enhances heat transfer by 3.17–4.29% compared to parallel-flow operation, while maintaining nearly identical pressure-drop values. This improvement is attributed to the preservation of a higher logarithmic mean temperature difference (LMTD) along the exchanger length, sustaining the thermal driving force under laminar flow conditions. In contrast, the parallel-flow configuration exhibits a rapid decay in temperature difference near the inlet region, limiting effective heat transfer. Although heat transfer increases with Reynolds number in both configurations, the thermo-hydraulic performance index decreases due to the relatively higher increase in hydraulic resistance. Comparison with classical laminar flow behavior confirmed the physical consistency and reliability of the numerical model. The findings demonstrate that counter-flow arrangement provides a measurable thermal advantage without additional hydraulic penalty. The study offers a physically consistent and practically relevant framework for the design and optimization of concentric tube heat exchangers used in engine cooling and waste heat recovery applications.

ProcessesVol. 14(10)
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Heat Transfer and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Controlled Conjugate CFD Comparison of Counter-Flow and Parallel-Flow Concentric Tube Heat Exchangers Under Identical Reynolds Conditions for Engine Cooling and Waste Heat Recovery · Processes (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS