Appraisals explain how moral events elicit emotions

Appraisal is a prominent component of theories of emotion. It explains how different people or even the same person can have various emotional reactions to the same event. Despite this, appraisal has played a minimal role in research on moral emotions. Theories of moral emotions have either omitted appraisal or examined a limited number of appraisal dimensions. Here, across four studies, we used appraisal dimensions to account for the multifarious relations between moral events and emotions. Results from Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated that individuals have a broader range of emotional responses to moral events than previously assumed, and that appraisals accounted for these differences. Specifically, appraisals of personal value increased all negative emotional reactions, while appraisals of control, unexpectedness and uncertainty distinguished between anger, disgust and surprise and fear, respectively. Study 3 demonstrated that experimentally manipulating these events to accentuate significant appraisal dimensions increased participants' corresponding appraisals and emotions. Finally, Study 4 showed that appraisals accounted for emotional responses to events before, during and after the 2020 US presidential election as real-world events unfolded. This research shows the need to incorporate appraisals into research on moral emotions, and it offers a framework for meeting this need.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2026.2667776
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appraisals explain how moral events elicit emotions

Cognition & Emotion
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Appraisals explain how moral events elicit emotions

article en

Abstract

Appraisal is a prominent component of theories of emotion. It explains how different people or even the same person can have various emotional reactions to the same event. Despite this, appraisal has played a minimal role in research on moral emotions. Theories of moral emotions have either omitted appraisal or examined a limited number of appraisal dimensions. Here, across four studies, we used appraisal dimensions to account for the multifarious relations between moral events and emotions. Results from Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated that individuals have a broader range of emotional responses to moral events than previously assumed, and that appraisals accounted for these differences. Specifically, appraisals of personal value increased all negative emotional reactions, while appraisals of control, unexpectedness and uncertainty distinguished between anger, disgust and surprise and fear, respectively. Study 3 demonstrated that experimentally manipulating these events to accentuate significant appraisal dimensions increased participants' corresponding appraisals and emotions. Finally, Study 4 showed that appraisals accounted for emotional responses to events before, during and after the 2020 US presidential election as real-world events unfolded. This research shows the need to incorporate appraisals into research on moral emotions, and it offers a framework for meeting this need.

Cognition & Emotion
Cornell University (US), University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.