A cross-sectional study on the quality of pediatric autism-related videos on short video platforms

This study evaluated the information quality, content characteristics, and distribution patterns of short videos concerning pediatric autism on three major Chinese platforms: TikTok, Bilibili, and Rednote. Employing a cross-sectional design, we retrieved videos using the keyword ‘’pediatric autism’’ and analyzed 279 eligible entries. We collected basic video characteristics and engagement metrics, while video quality and reliability were assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) instrument, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria, and the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI). Overall video quality was moderate, with a median GQS score of 3, but information reliability was poor, indicated by a median JAMA score of 1. Significant inter-platform differences emerged (p < 0.05): Bilibili videos were the longest, TikTok had the highest proportion of uploaders who were healthcare professionals (69.89%) and exhibited greater user engagement, whereas Rednote was dominated by individual users and contained a higher proportion of low-quality videos. Information on treatment costs was notably insufficient across all platforms. In conclusion, the quality of pediatric autism–related health information on short-video platforms varies substantially by platform, revealing a mismatch between available information and user needs. Enhancing professional content review mechanisms and encouraging greater participation by healthcare professionals could improve the dissemination of practical and reliable health information.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-53838-0
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cross-sectional study on the quality of pediatric autism-related videos on short video platforms

Scientific Reports
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

A cross-sectional study on the quality of pediatric autism-related videos on short video platforms

article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the information quality, content characteristics, and distribution patterns of short videos concerning pediatric autism on three major Chinese platforms: TikTok, Bilibili, and Rednote. Employing a cross-sectional design, we retrieved videos using the keyword ‘’pediatric autism’’ and analyzed 279 eligible entries. We collected basic video characteristics and engagement metrics, while video quality and reliability were assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) instrument, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria, and the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI). Overall video quality was moderate, with a median GQS score of 3, but information reliability was poor, indicated by a median JAMA score of 1. Significant inter-platform differences emerged (p < 0.05): Bilibili videos were the longest, TikTok had the highest proportion of uploaders who were healthcare professionals (69.89%) and exhibited greater user engagement, whereas Rednote was dominated by individual users and contained a higher proportion of low-quality videos. Information on treatment costs was notably insufficient across all platforms. In conclusion, the quality of pediatric autism–related health information on short-video platforms varies substantially by platform, revealing a mismatch between available information and user needs. Enhancing professional content review mechanisms and encouraging greater participation by healthcare professionals could improve the dissemination of practical and reliable health information.

Scientific Reports
Fuyang Normal University (CN), Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.