Profiling students who thrive in MOOCs: voluntary evaluators within a high-engagement cluster prioritize practical tools and structured content

This study complements the mainstream narrative in MOOC studies by emphasizing sustaining factors instead of dropout reasons. Using Kmeans clustering, sequential analysis, and course evaluation content analysis, we identified distinct engagement patterns and a nuanced view of student engagement in a MOOC. Frequent revisits defined the high-engagement cluster; within it, a subset of students voluntarily completed the end-of-course evaluation (hereafter, volunteer evaluators). These students showed targeted interactions, consistent activities, and emphasized values on practical tools and well-structured content. The findings provide insights into effective course design, emphasizing clear objectives, well-organized content, and the critical role of intrinsic motivation in sustaining engagement. This study highlights the importance of understanding diverse student behaviors to enhance MOOC engagement, particularly the unique characteristics of volunteer evaluators within a highly engaged cluster.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-026-09495-3
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Profiling students who thrive in MOOCs: voluntary evaluators within a high-engagement cluster prioritize practical tools and structured content

Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Profiling students who thrive in MOOCs: voluntary evaluators within a high-engagement cluster prioritize practical tools and structured content

article en

Abstract

This study complements the mainstream narrative in MOOC studies by emphasizing sustaining factors instead of dropout reasons. Using Kmeans clustering, sequential analysis, and course evaluation content analysis, we identified distinct engagement patterns and a nuanced view of student engagement in a MOOC. Frequent revisits defined the high-engagement cluster; within it, a subset of students voluntarily completed the end-of-course evaluation (hereafter, volunteer evaluators). These students showed targeted interactions, consistent activities, and emphasized values on practical tools and well-structured content. The findings provide insights into effective course design, emphasizing clear objectives, well-organized content, and the critical role of intrinsic motivation in sustaining engagement. This study highlights the importance of understanding diverse student behaviors to enhance MOOC engagement, particularly the unique characteristics of volunteer evaluators within a highly engaged cluster.

Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Florida State University (US), North Carolina State University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Profiling students who thrive in MOOCs: voluntary evaluators within a high-engagement cluster prioritize practical tools and structured content · Journal of Computing in Higher Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS