Contextual F0 cues can outweigh talker F0 cues in fricative perception

Listeners use information in the speech signal as well as linguistic and real-world knowledge to tackle the immense variability of speech. Here, we focus on the use of contextual and talker-bound fundamental frequency (F0) cues during the perception of voiceless fricatives' center of gravity (CoG). In Experiment 1, Dutch participants heard the sentence Nu komt het woord ?ok ("Now comes the word ?ok") where "?" denotes a fricative from a synthetic /s-ʃ/ continuum in three carrier F0 conditions (low, mid, high), and indicated whether they heard the high-CoG /sɔk/ "sock" or the low-CoG /ʃɔk/ "(to) trudge." We found a contrastive effect of context F0 on CoG perception whereby hearing a high F0 carrier sentence led to a lower fricative CoG perception. In Experiments 2a and b, an exposure phase was added where participants either heard a low or a high F0-shifted talker. At test, all participants heard fixed-F0 words /?ɔk/ and indicated whether they heard sok or sjok. Talker F0 guided participants' responses in both experiments, but across more trials in Experiment 2b than in Experiment 2a. In Experiment 3, combining context and talker manipulations, two groups of participants heard either a low or a high F0 talker in exposure, and both low and high F0-shifted carrier sentences at test. There was a large context F0 effect, but crucially, no talker F0 effect. Overall, we found evidence that both contextual and talker-bound F0 cues have contrastive effects on fricative perception, and that contextual cues, when present and sufficiently reliable, can outweigh talker cues.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Attention Perception & Psychophysics
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-026-03246-3
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contextual F0 cues can outweigh talker F0 cues in fricative perception

Attention Perception & Psychophysics
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Contextual F0 cues can outweigh talker F0 cues in fricative perception

article en

Abstract

Listeners use information in the speech signal as well as linguistic and real-world knowledge to tackle the immense variability of speech. Here, we focus on the use of contextual and talker-bound fundamental frequency (F0) cues during the perception of voiceless fricatives' center of gravity (CoG). In Experiment 1, Dutch participants heard the sentence Nu komt het woord ?ok ("Now comes the word ?ok") where "?" denotes a fricative from a synthetic /s-ʃ/ continuum in three carrier F0 conditions (low, mid, high), and indicated whether they heard the high-CoG /sɔk/ "sock" or the low-CoG /ʃɔk/ "(to) trudge." We found a contrastive effect of context F0 on CoG perception whereby hearing a high F0 carrier sentence led to a lower fricative CoG perception. In Experiments 2a and b, an exposure phase was added where participants either heard a low or a high F0-shifted talker. At test, all participants heard fixed-F0 words /?ɔk/ and indicated whether they heard sok or sjok. Talker F0 guided participants' responses in both experiments, but across more trials in Experiment 2b than in Experiment 2a. In Experiment 3, combining context and talker manipulations, two groups of participants heard either a low or a high F0 talker in exposure, and both low and high F0-shifted carrier sentences at test. There was a large context F0 effect, but crucially, no talker F0 effect. Overall, we found evidence that both contextual and talker-bound F0 cues have contrastive effects on fricative perception, and that contextual cues, when present and sufficiently reliable, can outweigh talker cues.

Attention Perception & PsychophysicsVol. 88(5)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.