A comparison of Irish and Swedish technology curricula: focus, form and function

Abstract Technology education varies significantly across national jurisdictions, reflecting diverse philosophical and historical trajectories. This study presents a comparative analysis of the intended technology curricula for lower secondary education in Ireland and Sweden. Using the three part heuristic framework for technology education, the research examines the distribution of learning outcomes across three categories which consist of technical skills, technological scientific knowledge, and socio ethical technical understanding. A qualitative content analysis was conducted on the subject specifications for the four Irish technology subjects, Applied Technology, Engineering, Graphics, and Wood Technology, alongside the single Swedish Technology subject. The findings reveal a marked divergence in pedagogical priorities between the two nations. Irish curricula are characterised by a high concentration of technical skills, particularly in Engineering and Graphics, where socio ethical considerations are notably minimal or absent. In contrast, the Swedish curriculum places a significantly higher emphasis on socio ethical understanding and the societal impact of technology, reflecting a more balanced epistemological profile. These results suggest a technical dominance within the Irish suite that potentially limits the development of holistic technological literacy. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for the ongoing redevelopment of the Irish Senior Cycle. It advocates for a more balanced integration of ethical and critical perspectives to ensure that students are prepared for the complexities of a contemporary technological society.

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-026-10103-9
Primary Topic
Science Education and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of Irish and Swedish technology curricula: focus, form and function

International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Science Education and Perceptions
article

A comparison of Irish and Swedish technology curricula: focus, form and function

article en

Abstract

Abstract Technology education varies significantly across national jurisdictions, reflecting diverse philosophical and historical trajectories. This study presents a comparative analysis of the intended technology curricula for lower secondary education in Ireland and Sweden. Using the three part heuristic framework for technology education, the research examines the distribution of learning outcomes across three categories which consist of technical skills, technological scientific knowledge, and socio ethical technical understanding. A qualitative content analysis was conducted on the subject specifications for the four Irish technology subjects, Applied Technology, Engineering, Graphics, and Wood Technology, alongside the single Swedish Technology subject. The findings reveal a marked divergence in pedagogical priorities between the two nations. Irish curricula are characterised by a high concentration of technical skills, particularly in Engineering and Graphics, where socio ethical considerations are notably minimal or absent. In contrast, the Swedish curriculum places a significantly higher emphasis on socio ethical understanding and the societal impact of technology, reflecting a more balanced epistemological profile. These results suggest a technical dominance within the Irish suite that potentially limits the development of holistic technological literacy. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for the ongoing redevelopment of the Irish Senior Cycle. It advocates for a more balanced integration of ethical and critical perspectives to ensure that students are prepared for the complexities of a contemporary technological society.

International Journal of Technology and Design Education
University of Limerick
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Science Education and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.