Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Natural Killer (CAR-NK) Cells in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: For almost two decades now, chimeric antigen receptor-natural killer cells (CAR-NK) have been investigated in pre-clinical breast cancer models, yet clinical evidence on efficacy remains scarce. This meta-analysis provides pooled evidence of pre-clinical CAR-NK effectiveness and safety in breast cancer and an overview of current clinical trials to support clinical translation. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and a registered protocol (PROSPERO, CRD420251131530), PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to 30 June 2025 for pre-clinical CAR-NK studies in breast cancer. Clinical studies were retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) up to 1 March 2026. Pre-clinical studies without in vivo data or non-human CAR-NK cells were excluded. Primary outcomes were tumor burden (ratio of means, ROMs) and survival (median survival ratio, MSR). Data were analyzed in JASP™ and risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using SYRCLE’s tool. Results: Fourteen pre-clinical studies (38 CAR-NK treatment groups targeting EGFR, HER2, tissue factor, CD70, mesothelin, or folate receptor, with peripheral blood as the primary NK source, and a 5–10 million cell dose) and 11 early-phase clinical studies (targeting HER2, TROP2, PD-L1, MUC1, or NKG2D ligands under ongoing investigation) were included. In pooled pre-clinical analysis, CAR-NK significantly reduced tumor burden against untreated and unmodified/mock controls (ROM 0.311 [0.22–0.44] and 0.42 [0.33–0.53], p < 0.001, respectively). Survival was also prolonged significantly (MSR 1.47 [1.15–1.87], p = 0.010 vs. untreated; 1.30 [1.09–1.60], p = 0.007 vs. unmodified/mock NK cells). Subgroup analyses indicated improved efficacy with peripheral blood source and 5–10 M dosing. No treatment-related toxicities were reported. CAR-NK persistence was generally higher than unmodified/mock NK cells. Discussion and Conclusions: Significant heterogeneity was observed in ROM analysis which the multi-level meta-analysis configured as intra-study interventional variability. There was moderate RoB in pre-clinical studies. Published results from clinical trials remain limited, highlighting early stages of investigation. Overall, CAR-NK therapy demonstrated consistent pre-clinical efficacy and safety, supporting further translational and clinical evaluation in breast cancer.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18101634
Primary Topic
Immune Cell Function and Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Natural Killer (CAR-NK) Cells in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers
Immune Cell Function and Interaction
article

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Natural Killer (CAR-NK) Cells in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

article en

Abstract

Background: For almost two decades now, chimeric antigen receptor-natural killer cells (CAR-NK) have been investigated in pre-clinical breast cancer models, yet clinical evidence on efficacy remains scarce. This meta-analysis provides pooled evidence of pre-clinical CAR-NK effectiveness and safety in breast cancer and an overview of current clinical trials to support clinical translation. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and a registered protocol (PROSPERO, CRD420251131530), PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to 30 June 2025 for pre-clinical CAR-NK studies in breast cancer. Clinical studies were retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) up to 1 March 2026. Pre-clinical studies without in vivo data or non-human CAR-NK cells were excluded. Primary outcomes were tumor burden (ratio of means, ROMs) and survival (median survival ratio, MSR). Data were analyzed in JASP™ and risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using SYRCLE’s tool. Results: Fourteen pre-clinical studies (38 CAR-NK treatment groups targeting EGFR, HER2, tissue factor, CD70, mesothelin, or folate receptor, with peripheral blood as the primary NK source, and a 5–10 million cell dose) and 11 early-phase clinical studies (targeting HER2, TROP2, PD-L1, MUC1, or NKG2D ligands under ongoing investigation) were included. In pooled pre-clinical analysis, CAR-NK significantly reduced tumor burden against untreated and unmodified/mock controls (ROM 0.311 [0.22–0.44] and 0.42 [0.33–0.53], p < 0.001, respectively). Survival was also prolonged significantly (MSR 1.47 [1.15–1.87], p = 0.010 vs. untreated; 1.30 [1.09–1.60], p = 0.007 vs. unmodified/mock NK cells). Subgroup analyses indicated improved efficacy with peripheral blood source and 5–10 M dosing. No treatment-related toxicities were reported. CAR-NK persistence was generally higher than unmodified/mock NK cells. Discussion and Conclusions: Significant heterogeneity was observed in ROM analysis which the multi-level meta-analysis configured as intra-study interventional variability. There was moderate RoB in pre-clinical studies. Published results from clinical trials remain limited, highlighting early stages of investigation. Overall, CAR-NK therapy demonstrated consistent pre-clinical efficacy and safety, supporting further translational and clinical evaluation in breast cancer.

CancersVol. 18(10)
University of Sargodha (PK), University of the Punjab (PK), Kunming Medical University (CN), The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Immune Cell Function and Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.