Review of Humanoid Robotic Astronauts for Space Missions

As human space missions become longer and more autonomous, robots are expected to assume broader responsibilities in inspection, maintenance, logistics, scientific support, and crew assistance. Among available robot forms, humanoid robotic astronauts are especially relevant because their anthropomorphic embodiment is compatible with human-centered habitats, tools, interfaces, and procedures. Their deployment in orbital and planetary environments, however, introduces challenges that differ from those of terrestrial humanoids, including floating-base dynamics, intermittent contact, whole-body coordination, constrained perception, and delayed supervision. This review contributes a mission-oriented and astronaut-centered synthesis of humanoid robotic astronauts, distinguishing itself from platform-by-platform or morphology-only surveys. It treats these systems as mission-compatible embodied agents whose feasibility depends on the coupling among mission context, morphology, contact behavior, perception, autonomy, and validation evidence. The primary goals are threefold: to classify representative platforms according to mission context, to synthesize the core technical foundations required for mission-compatible operation, and to identify cross-cutting deployment bottlenecks and benchmarking priorities for future development. Representative systems are organized into intravehicular assistance, extravehicular operations and on-orbit servicing, and surface exploration or transitional scenarios, showing how mission demands shape embodiment, mobility, manipulation, autonomy, and validation strategies. This review further summarizes recent progress in microgravity dynamics and contact mechanics, multimodal perception and scene understanding, whole-body motion planning and control, teleoperation and supervised autonomy, and evaluation and benchmarking methods. The analysis indicates that humanoid robotic astronauts are not simple extensions of terrestrial humanoids but astronaut-oriented embodied systems for mission-constrained environments. Three priorities are identified for future development: contact-rich whole-body intelligence under support transitions, delay-tolerant supervised autonomy with explicit authority handoff, and systematic benchmarking pipelines that connect simulation, ground analogs, short-duration microgravity tests, human-in-the-loop trials, and mission-context demonstrations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16105032
Primary Topic
Space Exploration and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of Humanoid Robotic Astronauts for Space Missions

Applied Sciences
Space Exploration and Technology
article

Review of Humanoid Robotic Astronauts for Space Missions

article en

Abstract

As human space missions become longer and more autonomous, robots are expected to assume broader responsibilities in inspection, maintenance, logistics, scientific support, and crew assistance. Among available robot forms, humanoid robotic astronauts are especially relevant because their anthropomorphic embodiment is compatible with human-centered habitats, tools, interfaces, and procedures. Their deployment in orbital and planetary environments, however, introduces challenges that differ from those of terrestrial humanoids, including floating-base dynamics, intermittent contact, whole-body coordination, constrained perception, and delayed supervision. This review contributes a mission-oriented and astronaut-centered synthesis of humanoid robotic astronauts, distinguishing itself from platform-by-platform or morphology-only surveys. It treats these systems as mission-compatible embodied agents whose feasibility depends on the coupling among mission context, morphology, contact behavior, perception, autonomy, and validation evidence. The primary goals are threefold: to classify representative platforms according to mission context, to synthesize the core technical foundations required for mission-compatible operation, and to identify cross-cutting deployment bottlenecks and benchmarking priorities for future development. Representative systems are organized into intravehicular assistance, extravehicular operations and on-orbit servicing, and surface exploration or transitional scenarios, showing how mission demands shape embodiment, mobility, manipulation, autonomy, and validation strategies. This review further summarizes recent progress in microgravity dynamics and contact mechanics, multimodal perception and scene understanding, whole-body motion planning and control, teleoperation and supervised autonomy, and evaluation and benchmarking methods. The analysis indicates that humanoid robotic astronauts are not simple extensions of terrestrial humanoids but astronaut-oriented embodied systems for mission-constrained environments. Three priorities are identified for future development: contact-rich whole-body intelligence under support transitions, delay-tolerant supervised autonomy with explicit authority handoff, and systematic benchmarking pipelines that connect simulation, ground analogs, short-duration microgravity tests, human-in-the-loop trials, and mission-context demonstrations.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(10)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), China Academy of Space Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Space Exploration and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.