A systematic review of the LIS research on homelessness and libraries

This systematic review examines the prevalence, scope, and theoretical underpinnings of scholarly research looking at the intersections of homelessness and libraries from 2000 to 2025. Specifically, this review questions how common research is on this topic, how subtopics including services to families and youth experiencing homelessness and social work in libraries are covered, and what (if any) theoretical frameworks are used. The review found that only 51 articles where published in peer-reviewed library and information science journals in English between 2000 and 2025. Interviews with library workers were the most common methodology used and recent scholarship on social workers in libraries has increased the number of articles being published. Additionally, less than a quarter of the articles in the review were explicit about a conceptual and theoretical framework for the research.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006261449847
Primary Topic
Library Science and Administration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of the LIS research on homelessness and libraries

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Library Science and Administration
article

A systematic review of the LIS research on homelessness and libraries

article en

Abstract

This systematic review examines the prevalence, scope, and theoretical underpinnings of scholarly research looking at the intersections of homelessness and libraries from 2000 to 2025. Specifically, this review questions how common research is on this topic, how subtopics including services to families and youth experiencing homelessness and social work in libraries are covered, and what (if any) theoretical frameworks are used. The review found that only 51 articles where published in peer-reviewed library and information science journals in English between 2000 and 2025. Interviews with library workers were the most common methodology used and recent scholarship on social workers in libraries has increased the number of articles being published. Additionally, less than a quarter of the articles in the review were explicit about a conceptual and theoretical framework for the research.

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Queens College, CUNY (US), Flushing Hospital Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Library Science and Administration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.