Comparison of Phase Separation and Membrane Formation Behavior of Novel Amphiphilic Block Copolymers for Anti-Fouling Improvement of Ultrafiltration Membranes

The comparison of the ability of poly(phenylene sulfone) (PPSU), a recently introduced alternative membrane polymer, with established poly(ether sulfone) (PESU), both in combination with tailored amphiphilic block copolymer additives to improve ultrafiltration (UF) membrane separation and anti-fouling performance is the focus of this work. Different poly(alkylene oxide)-containing tri- and multiblock polymers with hydrophobic blocks analogous to the respective base polymer, PPSU or PESU, of varied length were used as additives in the casting solution. Membranes were subsequently prepared via film casting and a liquid non-solvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) process. The rheological properties and thermodynamic stability of the casting solutions were investigated. At the same mass concentration, PPSU-based casting solutions show overall higher viscosity that is also more sensitive to the presence of additives compared with PESU-based solutions. PPSU-based casting solutions also have lower tolerance to non-solvents. By adding certain block copolymers in ratios of up 10 wt.% relative to the base polymer, it is possible to increase the UF performance of the membranes of PPSU and PESU. An increase in the block length of the hydrophobic block of PESU leads to a reduction in pure water permeance (PWP), whereas for PPSU, PWP is increased by the addition of additives. Especially additives with shorter PESU or PPSU block length, i.e., with a larger fraction of poly(ethylene oxide) blocks in the casting solution, seem to act as additional pore-forming agents. The water contact angle can be decreased for both additive systems, indicating a more hydrophilic membrane surface. Finally, using flower soil extract as a model substance for surface water, interesting candidates of additives that enable fouling reduction with competitive UF performance were identified for PESU and PPSU membranes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Membranes
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes16050178
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Phase Separation and Membrane Formation Behavior of Novel Amphiphilic Block Copolymers for Anti-Fouling Improvement of Ultrafiltration Membranes

Membranes
Membrane Separation Technologies
article

Comparison of Phase Separation and Membrane Formation Behavior of Novel Amphiphilic Block Copolymers for Anti-Fouling Improvement of Ultrafiltration Membranes

article en

Abstract

The comparison of the ability of poly(phenylene sulfone) (PPSU), a recently introduced alternative membrane polymer, with established poly(ether sulfone) (PESU), both in combination with tailored amphiphilic block copolymer additives to improve ultrafiltration (UF) membrane separation and anti-fouling performance is the focus of this work. Different poly(alkylene oxide)-containing tri- and multiblock polymers with hydrophobic blocks analogous to the respective base polymer, PPSU or PESU, of varied length were used as additives in the casting solution. Membranes were subsequently prepared via film casting and a liquid non-solvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) process. The rheological properties and thermodynamic stability of the casting solutions were investigated. At the same mass concentration, PPSU-based casting solutions show overall higher viscosity that is also more sensitive to the presence of additives compared with PESU-based solutions. PPSU-based casting solutions also have lower tolerance to non-solvents. By adding certain block copolymers in ratios of up 10 wt.% relative to the base polymer, it is possible to increase the UF performance of the membranes of PPSU and PESU. An increase in the block length of the hydrophobic block of PESU leads to a reduction in pure water permeance (PWP), whereas for PPSU, PWP is increased by the addition of additives. Especially additives with shorter PESU or PPSU block length, i.e., with a larger fraction of poly(ethylene oxide) blocks in the casting solution, seem to act as additional pore-forming agents. The water contact angle can be decreased for both additive systems, indicating a more hydrophilic membrane surface. Finally, using flower soil extract as a model substance for surface water, interesting candidates of additives that enable fouling reduction with competitive UF performance were identified for PESU and PPSU membranes.

MembranesVol. 16(5)
BASF (Germany) (DE), Materials and Systems Research (United States) (US), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Universität Duisburg-Essen
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Membrane Separation Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.