Liar, Liar, LLM on Fire: Investigating Deception in Turkish Text Generation

“Is a Large Language Model (LLM) a good liar? Can we detect its lies for Turkish?” LLMs are capable of generating deceptive or misleading information, which can be considered as “lying”. In this paper, we introduce a dataset called TQuADFake , consisting of correct and incorrect sentences generated by LLMs through the Question Answering (QA) task. We evaluate the quality of the dataset using both human and LLM evaluators. We explore linguistic features that may help distinguish incorrect sentences and build a lie detection model based on these features. Our analysis shows that while linguistic features are useful for identifying differences between correct and incorrect sentences, these features alone are insufficient to fully solve the lie detection problem. We also investigate whether LLMs are aware of their own inaccuracies and compare various models’ performance on this task, including SVM, pre-trained language models (PLMs), and LLMs. This study provides a foundation for future research on misinformation detection in Turkish and highlights the challenges in building effective lie detection systems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3811025
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liar, Liar, LLM on Fire: Investigating Deception in Turkish Text Generation

ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Liar, Liar, LLM on Fire: Investigating Deception in Turkish Text Generation

article en

Abstract

“Is a Large Language Model (LLM) a good liar? Can we detect its lies for Turkish?” LLMs are capable of generating deceptive or misleading information, which can be considered as “lying”. In this paper, we introduce a dataset called TQuADFake , consisting of correct and incorrect sentences generated by LLMs through the Question Answering (QA) task. We evaluate the quality of the dataset using both human and LLM evaluators. We explore linguistic features that may help distinguish incorrect sentences and build a lie detection model based on these features. Our analysis shows that while linguistic features are useful for identifying differences between correct and incorrect sentences, these features alone are insufficient to fully solve the lie detection problem. We also investigate whether LLMs are aware of their own inaccuracies and compare various models’ performance on this task, including SVM, pre-trained language models (PLMs), and LLMs. This study provides a foundation for future research on misinformation detection in Turkish and highlights the challenges in building effective lie detection systems.

ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Necmettin Erbakan University (TR), Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi (TR), Data61 (AU), Turgut Özal University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.