Analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided single puncture, dual injection, anterior approach targeting branches of the lumbosacral plexus versus lumbar epidural for unilateral lower limb orthopedic surgery: A randomized controlled study

Abstract Background and Aims: The traditional approach to combined lumbar and sacral plexus block require multiple injections with the patient in the lateral or prone position. We designed a study to compare the novel single puncture, dual injection, anterior approach targeting the branches of the lumbosacral plexus versus lumbar epidural for postoperative analgesia. Material and Methods: The present study enrolled 134 adult patients scheduled for unilateral lower limb orthopedic surgery under combined spinal epidural anesthesia without epidural activation. Study participants were randomly assigned to either group B (lumbosacral plexus block) or group E (lumbar epidural). Postoperatively, patients in group ‘B’ received the ultrasound-guided single puncture, dual injection, block via anterior approach targeting the branches of the ipsilateral lumbosacral plexus, while patients in group ‘E’ received lumbar epidural. All patients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). The primary objective of the study was to compare postoperative analgesia as assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS) score at predefined time points (0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h) between groups. The secondary objectives were the comparison of sensory block, motor block, rescue analgesic requirement, complications, and patient satisfaction. Results: Patients in group B had significantly lower median (quartile) NRS scores (at rest and movement) at predefined time points compared to patients in group E ( P -value < 0.001). The median PCEA pump boluses attempted and delivered were significantly lower in group B ( P -value < 0.001), and a lesser number of patients required rescue analgesia in group B than in group E ( P -value < 0.001). Group B had fewer patients with hypotension and PONV and a significantly higher median satisfaction score than group E ( P < 0.001). Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided single puncture, dual injection, anterior approach targeting branches of the lumbosacral plexus provides better postoperative analgesia and is as safe as epidural analgesia.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_394_25
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided single puncture, dual injection, anterior approach targeting branches of the lumbosacral plexus versus lumbar epidural for unilateral lower limb orthopedic surgery: A randomized controlled study

Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided single puncture, dual injection, anterior approach targeting branches of the lumbosacral plexus versus lumbar epidural for unilateral lower limb orthopedic surgery: A randomized controlled study

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims: The traditional approach to combined lumbar and sacral plexus block require multiple injections with the patient in the lateral or prone position. We designed a study to compare the novel single puncture, dual injection, anterior approach targeting the branches of the lumbosacral plexus versus lumbar epidural for postoperative analgesia. Material and Methods: The present study enrolled 134 adult patients scheduled for unilateral lower limb orthopedic surgery under combined spinal epidural anesthesia without epidural activation. Study participants were randomly assigned to either group B (lumbosacral plexus block) or group E (lumbar epidural). Postoperatively, patients in group ‘B’ received the ultrasound-guided single puncture, dual injection, block via anterior approach targeting the branches of the ipsilateral lumbosacral plexus, while patients in group ‘E’ received lumbar epidural. All patients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). The primary objective of the study was to compare postoperative analgesia as assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS) score at predefined time points (0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h) between groups. The secondary objectives were the comparison of sensory block, motor block, rescue analgesic requirement, complications, and patient satisfaction. Results: Patients in group B had significantly lower median (quartile) NRS scores (at rest and movement) at predefined time points compared to patients in group E ( P -value < 0.001). The median PCEA pump boluses attempted and delivered were significantly lower in group B ( P -value < 0.001), and a lesser number of patients required rescue analgesia in group B than in group E ( P -value < 0.001). Group B had fewer patients with hypotension and PONV and a significantly higher median satisfaction score than group E ( P < 0.001). Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided single puncture, dual injection, anterior approach targeting branches of the lumbosacral plexus provides better postoperative analgesia and is as safe as epidural analgesia.

Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.