Exploring the association of student perceptions of science instruction and emotional engagement: The variance between grade level

Abstract Previous research has consistently shown that students have higher learning interests, attitudes, and motivation toward science in elementary school compared to middle and high school. However, the key predictors behind the observed differences in engagement levels across grade levels remain unclear. This study aims to identify the association between students’ perceptions of science instruction and their emotional engagement, as well as to examine the differences across various educational stages. A 2-level organizational multilevel model was employed to investigate this association. In addition, the analysis examined whether the associations varied between grade levels. A sample of 6465 students from 3rd grade to 12th grade from 25 schools participated in the study. This study shows that students in higher grades have significantly lower emotional engagement comparedar to third-grade students. Findings reveal significant associations between students’ perceptions of science instruction, both in perceiving it as interesting and understandable, and their emotional engagement in science learning. There is a greater increase in students’ emotional engagement in a transition year (i.e., sixth grade) when they perceive science class as interesting than in other grades. There were no statistically significant differences between grades in students’ perception of science as understandable and emotional engagement. This study provides evidence of the importance of delivering interesting and well-designed science classes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Instructional Science
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09800-8
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the association of student perceptions of science instruction and emotional engagement: The variance between grade level

Instructional Science
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Exploring the association of student perceptions of science instruction and emotional engagement: The variance between grade level

article en

Abstract

Abstract Previous research has consistently shown that students have higher learning interests, attitudes, and motivation toward science in elementary school compared to middle and high school. However, the key predictors behind the observed differences in engagement levels across grade levels remain unclear. This study aims to identify the association between students’ perceptions of science instruction and their emotional engagement, as well as to examine the differences across various educational stages. A 2-level organizational multilevel model was employed to investigate this association. In addition, the analysis examined whether the associations varied between grade levels. A sample of 6465 students from 3rd grade to 12th grade from 25 schools participated in the study. This study shows that students in higher grades have significantly lower emotional engagement comparedar to third-grade students. Findings reveal significant associations between students’ perceptions of science instruction, both in perceiving it as interesting and understandable, and their emotional engagement in science learning. There is a greater increase in students’ emotional engagement in a transition year (i.e., sixth grade) when they perceive science class as interesting than in other grades. There were no statistically significant differences between grades in students’ perception of science as understandable and emotional engagement. This study provides evidence of the importance of delivering interesting and well-designed science classes.

Instructional ScienceVol. 54(2)
University of Virginia (US), Australian Catholic University (AU)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.