Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Barriers to Reproductive Care Access in One Urban City: A Qualitative Study

Inequities exist in reproductive care access for biological women of childbearing age from minoritized, racialized, and lower socioeconomic communities in the United States. While patient-reported barriers are well documented, less is known about healthcare providers' perceptions of these challenges in urban, under-resourced contexts. Providers' frontline insights are essential for understanding operational, institutional, and community-level obstacles and for designing more effective, contextually relevant interventions. This qualitative study explores providers' perspectives on the barriers clients face when accessing reproductive care in Washington, DC. We conducted in-depth interviews with 14 reproductive healthcare providers. The analysis yielded four themes: (1) limited health literacy: lack of or limited health and resources knowledge, (2) distrust and mistrust: skepticism toward health-related information and hesitancy to seek reproductive care, (3) challenges navigating care: challenges centered on engagement with available healthcare services, and (4) upstream structural barriers: policy-driven challenges that affect clinic operations and financial stability. Collectively, these findings underscore persistent barriers to reproductive care, even in contexts with broad insurance coverage, highlighting the disconnect between coverage and meaningful access. Despite high insurance coverage in DC, low-income, publicly-insured patients continue to encounter significant obstacles to reproductive care. Addressing these challenges requires policies that ensure healthcare systems provide accessible, patient-centered, and equitable care, as well as interventions that meaningfully integrate provider perspectives to enhance relevance, feasibility, promote provider engagement and buy-in, and support the long-term scalability and sustainability of efforts aimed at improving equitable access. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study provides insight from reproductive healthcare providers serving patients in Wards 1, 4, 5, and 7 of the District of Columbia, Washington. All aspects of this qualitative study were informed by a community-advisory board (CAB) made up of members from these respective wards.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Nursing & Health
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70082
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Barriers to Reproductive Care Access in One Urban City: A Qualitative Study

Research in Nursing & Health
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Barriers to Reproductive Care Access in One Urban City: A Qualitative Study

article en

Abstract

Inequities exist in reproductive care access for biological women of childbearing age from minoritized, racialized, and lower socioeconomic communities in the United States. While patient-reported barriers are well documented, less is known about healthcare providers' perceptions of these challenges in urban, under-resourced contexts. Providers' frontline insights are essential for understanding operational, institutional, and community-level obstacles and for designing more effective, contextually relevant interventions. This qualitative study explores providers' perspectives on the barriers clients face when accessing reproductive care in Washington, DC. We conducted in-depth interviews with 14 reproductive healthcare providers. The analysis yielded four themes: (1) limited health literacy: lack of or limited health and resources knowledge, (2) distrust and mistrust: skepticism toward health-related information and hesitancy to seek reproductive care, (3) challenges navigating care: challenges centered on engagement with available healthcare services, and (4) upstream structural barriers: policy-driven challenges that affect clinic operations and financial stability. Collectively, these findings underscore persistent barriers to reproductive care, even in contexts with broad insurance coverage, highlighting the disconnect between coverage and meaningful access. Despite high insurance coverage in DC, low-income, publicly-insured patients continue to encounter significant obstacles to reproductive care. Addressing these challenges requires policies that ensure healthcare systems provide accessible, patient-centered, and equitable care, as well as interventions that meaningfully integrate provider perspectives to enhance relevance, feasibility, promote provider engagement and buy-in, and support the long-term scalability and sustainability of efforts aimed at improving equitable access. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study provides insight from reproductive healthcare providers serving patients in Wards 1, 4, 5, and 7 of the District of Columbia, Washington. All aspects of this qualitative study were informed by a community-advisory board (CAB) made up of members from these respective wards.

Research in Nursing & Health
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), Georgetown University (US), Brightwood College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.