“We, the conspiracy theorists.” How people do symbolic boundary work in the “Great Reset” debates across social media platforms

Conspiracy theories spread rapidly on social media. A growing field of research has examined how social media platforms shape conspiracy narratives and cultures. However, this technological focus has largely overshadowed social media users’ own agency toward collective identity construction. This article examines how users in online conspiracy communities construct collective identities through symbolic boundary work. Focusing on discussions surrounding the “Great Reset” conspiracy theory, across six major social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, YouTube, Reddit, and TikTok), we use multimodal discourse analysis to analyze 630 posts and their comments. Our findings reveal that users do symbolic boundary work by defining themselves as “critical thinkers,” reclaiming the label “conspiracy theorist,” and affectively transforming personal struggles into shared narratives, creating a shared identity in contrast to the “mainstream other.” The study contributes to research on social media and conspiracy cultures by foregrounding identity over content, offering insight into how users build solidarity online.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Media & Society
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261446590
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“We, the conspiracy theorists.” How people do symbolic boundary work in the “Great Reset” debates across social media platforms

New Media & Society
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

“We, the conspiracy theorists.” How people do symbolic boundary work in the “Great Reset” debates across social media platforms

article en

Abstract

Conspiracy theories spread rapidly on social media. A growing field of research has examined how social media platforms shape conspiracy narratives and cultures. However, this technological focus has largely overshadowed social media users’ own agency toward collective identity construction. This article examines how users in online conspiracy communities construct collective identities through symbolic boundary work. Focusing on discussions surrounding the “Great Reset” conspiracy theory, across six major social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, YouTube, Reddit, and TikTok), we use multimodal discourse analysis to analyze 630 posts and their comments. Our findings reveal that users do symbolic boundary work by defining themselves as “critical thinkers,” reclaiming the label “conspiracy theorist,” and affectively transforming personal struggles into shared narratives, creating a shared identity in contrast to the “mainstream other.” The study contributes to research on social media and conspiracy cultures by foregrounding identity over content, offering insight into how users build solidarity online.

New Media & Society
University of Groningen (NL), Institute for European Environmental Policy (BE)
Arts and Humanities Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.