Remote collaborative fieldwork in the global South: Equity implications for researchers and participants

The international research community is paying increasing attention to inequities related to academic fieldwork in the global South. Globalisation, technological advancements, travel carbon footprint concerns and COVID-19 ramifications have made online fieldwork more viable. This has led to the rise of ‘remote collaborative fieldwork’, where Northern researchers participate online whilst Southern researchers are physically in the field. The equity implications of this model are yet to be explored. We employ a conceptual framework to assess equity dynamics associated with remote collaborative fieldwork in social sciences for Northern researchers, Southern researchers and Southern participants. We use qualitative fieldwork with Ghanaian smallholder farmers as a case study, analysing reflexive field notes and semi-structured interviews. We find that remote fieldwork does not change fundamental inequities between researchers and participants, such as extractive power dynamics, and involves various trade-offs, but may encourage the redistribution of research experience, budget allocation and decision-making towards Southern researchers.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941261451387
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote collaborative fieldwork in the global South: Equity implications for researchers and participants

Qualitative Research
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

Remote collaborative fieldwork in the global South: Equity implications for researchers and participants

article en

Abstract

The international research community is paying increasing attention to inequities related to academic fieldwork in the global South. Globalisation, technological advancements, travel carbon footprint concerns and COVID-19 ramifications have made online fieldwork more viable. This has led to the rise of ‘remote collaborative fieldwork’, where Northern researchers participate online whilst Southern researchers are physically in the field. The equity implications of this model are yet to be explored. We employ a conceptual framework to assess equity dynamics associated with remote collaborative fieldwork in social sciences for Northern researchers, Southern researchers and Southern participants. We use qualitative fieldwork with Ghanaian smallholder farmers as a case study, analysing reflexive field notes and semi-structured interviews. We find that remote fieldwork does not change fundamental inequities between researchers and participants, such as extractive power dynamics, and involves various trade-offs, but may encourage the redistribution of research experience, budget allocation and decision-making towards Southern researchers.

Qualitative Research
University of Oxford (GB), The Forestry Commission of Ghana (GH), Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (GH), Forestry Research Institute of Ghana
Royal Geographical Society, Frank Jackson Foundation, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.