Resilience and disempowerment in algorithmic systems

Many social media platforms now employ adaptive recommendation algorithms to present content to users, raising concerns about how these systems reduce user agency. Accordingly, scholars have begun investigating how users develop awareness of these algorithms and how they use their understanding to engage with these systems effectively. Taking a focused experimental, mixed-methods approach, this study investigates the choices users ( N = 263) make when interacting with algorithmically mediated feeds of social media content and their perceptions of these systems. We found that people made more homogeneous selections when interacting with an adaptive algorithm compared to an algorithm that maintained content diversity. In addition, we found themes of resilience, disempowerment, and distress in participants’ experiences with our algorithmically mediated feeds. Findings call attention to the complex interplay between individual-level differences and algorithmic influences on decision-making when engaging with social media content.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Media & Society
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261446591
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resilience and disempowerment in algorithmic systems

New Media & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Resilience and disempowerment in algorithmic systems

article en

Abstract

Many social media platforms now employ adaptive recommendation algorithms to present content to users, raising concerns about how these systems reduce user agency. Accordingly, scholars have begun investigating how users develop awareness of these algorithms and how they use their understanding to engage with these systems effectively. Taking a focused experimental, mixed-methods approach, this study investigates the choices users ( N = 263) make when interacting with algorithmically mediated feeds of social media content and their perceptions of these systems. We found that people made more homogeneous selections when interacting with an adaptive algorithm compared to an algorithm that maintained content diversity. In addition, we found themes of resilience, disempowerment, and distress in participants’ experiences with our algorithmically mediated feeds. Findings call attention to the complex interplay between individual-level differences and algorithmic influences on decision-making when engaging with social media content.

New Media & Society
Western University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.