Revisiting the lipid ratio in lipid nanoparticles: A comparison of OFAT and design of experiments approaches

Abstract Despite the clinical success of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), formulation optimisation remains dominated by inherited lipid ratios and screening approaches that fail to capture the combined influence of composition and manufacturing process. In this study, one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) and Design of Experiments (DoE) strategies were applied to investigate how lipid molar ratio influences critical quality attributes (CQAs) and mRNA expression. In addition, manually executed and automated microfluidic manufacturing methods were compared to assess their impact on formulation–performance relationships. Across all strategies, multiple formulations beyond the standard molar ratio achieved comparable physicochemical properties, including particle size < 120 nm, low polydispersity index (PDI < 0.2), and high encapsulation efficiency (> 75%). Differences in CQAs and expression profiles were observed between manually and automated microfluidic manufactured DoE formulations, indicating that both composition and process conditions influence formulation performance. DoE analysis revealed non-linear and process-dependent relationships between lipid composition and CQAs, with limited predictive capability within the explored design space, particularly for biological outputs. Comparison of OFAT and DoE datasets demonstrated that while OFAT identifies directional trends within a constrained design space, DoE provides broader insight into interaction effects and formulation trade-offs. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the conventional lipid ratio represents a robust but not necessarily optimal formulation and support a shift towards context-dependent, design-space-driven optimisation of LNP systems. Graphical abstract Schematic illustrating the experimental workflow used to compare one‑factor‑at‑a‑time (OFAT) and Design of Experiments (DoE) approaches for lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulation development, including manual and automated microfluidic manufacture and subsequent physicochemical and biological evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug Delivery and Translational Research
Published
2026-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-026-02125-6
Primary Topic
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the lipid ratio in lipid nanoparticles: A comparison of OFAT and design of experiments approaches

Benjamin R. Knappett, Jade Forrester, Eleanor Vaughan, Yvonne Perrie
Drug Delivery and Translational Research
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
article

Revisiting the lipid ratio in lipid nanoparticles: A comparison of OFAT and design of experiments approaches

Benjamin R. Knappett, Jade Forrester, Eleanor Vaughan, Yvonne Perrie
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite the clinical success of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), formulation optimisation remains dominated by inherited lipid ratios and screening approaches that fail to capture the combined influence of composition and manufacturing process. In this study, one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) and Design of Experiments (DoE) strategies were applied to investigate how lipid molar ratio influences critical quality attributes (CQAs) and mRNA expression. In addition, manually executed and automated microfluidic manufacturing methods were compared to assess their impact on formulation–performance relationships. Across all strategies, multiple formulations beyond the standard molar ratio achieved comparable physicochemical properties, including particle size < 120 nm, low polydispersity index (PDI < 0.2), and high encapsulation efficiency (> 75%). Differences in CQAs and expression profiles were observed between manually and automated microfluidic manufactured DoE formulations, indicating that both composition and process conditions influence formulation performance. DoE analysis revealed non-linear and process-dependent relationships between lipid composition and CQAs, with limited predictive capability within the explored design space, particularly for biological outputs. Comparison of OFAT and DoE datasets demonstrated that while OFAT identifies directional trends within a constrained design space, DoE provides broader insight into interaction effects and formulation trade-offs. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the conventional lipid ratio represents a robust but not necessarily optimal formulation and support a shift towards context-dependent, design-space-driven optimisation of LNP systems. Graphical abstract Schematic illustrating the experimental workflow used to compare one‑factor‑at‑a‑time (OFAT) and Design of Experiments (DoE) approaches for lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulation development, including manual and automated microfluidic manufacture and subsequent physicochemical and biological evaluation.

Drug Delivery and Translational Research
University of Strathclyde (GB), Melbourn Science Park (GB), Royston Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.